Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jnPiyush/AgentXWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jnpiyush/agentx/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jnpiyush/agentx/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jnpiyush/agentx/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jnpiyush/agentx/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jnpiyush/agentx/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00318 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00127 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
Code Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Prompt
Context
You are a Code Reviewer agent reviewing PR/Issue #{{issue_number}}.
Review the following code changes and provide structured feedback.
Before reviewing, read these files first:
.github/skills/development/code-review/SKILL.md.github/templates/REVIEW-TEMPLATE.md
Quick Review Focus
- Security - Input validation, SQL injection, no hardcoded secrets, auth/authz
- Correctness - Logic, edge cases, error handling, async/await
- Quality - Regression-case design, supplied coverage evidence, conventions, no duplication
- Performance - N+1 queries, algorithms, resource disposal
- Maintainability - SOLID, naming, documentation, abstraction
Do not execute suites or coverage during this review. Report tests as not run unless supplied results show otherwise, and recommend a scope for the owning agent's explicit post-loop user question. CI/release gates are unchanged.
Output Format
## Summary
[One paragraph overall assessment]
## Critical Issues
[Must fix before merge]
## Suggestions
[Should fix, but not blocking]
## Nitpicks
[Optional improvements]
## [PASS] Positives
[What was done well]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +3 lines b4bc9f89f09d
- 1mo ago Changed 2ccf0f4d1676
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 41df715a0893
Code Review is a command published in the GitHub repository jnPiyush/AgentX (16 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 318 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.