Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00284 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00114 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
spring-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Spring Boot Review
Review a Spring Boot codebase using smart skill detection and parallel execution.
Scope
$ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Use the Agent tool to invoke the spring-boot-reviewer agent with the scope above.
The agent orchestrates a 3-phase review:
Phase 1: Discovery (haiku)
- Parse the scope and detect Spring Boot version
- Identify which skills are relevant based on files in scope
- Skip skills with no matching files
Phase 2: Parallel Review (sonnet agents)
- Launch skill-specific reviewer agents IN PARALLEL
- Each reviewer reads skill docs and checks assigned files
- Only reports issues with confidence ≥80
Phase 3: Report
- Consolidate findings from all reviewers
- Present unified report grouped by skill area
- Include fix suggestions for each finding
Example Scopes
all— Review entire projectthe order module— Review order-related codesecurity configuration— Review security setupcontrollers— Review all controllerscom.example.order— Review specific packagesrc/main/java/.../OrderController.java— Review specific file
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 43 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e2c721ecb70a
spring-review is a command published in the GitHub repository joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins (21 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 284 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-16.
Other commands, from other repositories
fastapi-review
Review a FastAPI application for architecture, async correctness, dependency injection, Pydantic schemas, security, performance, and testability.
audit-project
Multi-agent code review with iterative improvement.
ship-ci-review-loop
Command "ship-ci-review-loop" from composio-community/awesome-claude-plugins, covering phase 4: ci & review monitor loop - reference, this phase is mandatory, pr auto-review process, why all comments matter and the monitor loop algorithm.
p5-review-sprint
Runs ONE final code review over the entire sprint at sprint end, with a stronger model, to catch issues that single-story reviews structurally cannot see: cross-story interactions, the schema/data model as a whole, conformance to ADRs and Constitution Inviolables, and consistency with prior lessons/instincts.
p3-arch-components
Creates the system architecture overview with component diagram, responsibilities and data flows.
p3-sec-api
Defines input validation, rate limiting, CORS and security headers.