Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/joasasantos/claudeadvancedplugins/pentest-webgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JoasASantos/ClaudeAdvancedPluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/joasasantos/claudeadvancedplugins/pentest-web)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/joasasantos/claudeadvancedplugins/pentest-web"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/joasasantos/claudeadvancedplugins/pentest-web.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00497 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
pentest-web scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Web Application Penetration Testing
Expert web application security testing following OWASP methodology.
Testing Categories (OWASP Top 10 2021 + Beyond)
A01: Broken Access Control
- IDOR (Insecure Direct Object References)
- Privilege escalation (horizontal/vertical)
- JWT/session token manipulation
- CORS misconfiguration
- Directory traversal
- Force browsing
A02: Cryptographic Failures
- TLS configuration analysis
- Weak cipher suites
- Sensitive data exposure in transit/at rest
- Insecure random number generation
- Certificate validation bypass
A03: Injection
- SQL injection (Union, Blind, Time-based, Error-based, OOB)
- NoSQL injection (MongoDB, CouchDB)
- LDAP injection
- OS command injection
- Template injection (SSTI)
- Expression Language injection
- Header injection (CRLF, Host)
A04: Insecure Design
- Business logic flaws
- Race conditions (TOCTOU)
- Mass assignment
- API abuse scenarios
- Workflow bypass
A05: Security Misconfiguration
- Default credentials
- Unnecessary features enabled
- Missing security headers
- Verbose error messages
- Directory listing
- Outdated software
A06: Vulnerable Components
- Dependency vulnerability scanning
- Known CVE exploitation
- Supply chain analysis
A07: Authentication Failures
- Brute force protection testing
- Password policy evaluation
- MFA bypass techniques
- Session management flaws
- OAuth/OIDC misconfigurations
- Password reset poisoning
A08: Data Integrity Failures
- Deserialization vulnerabilities (Java, PHP, Python, .NET)
- CI/CD pipeline security
- Unsigned updates
A09: Logging & Monitoring Gaps
- Log injection
- Insufficient logging assessment
- Alert bypass
A10: SSRF
- Internal service access
- Cloud metadata endpoints
- Protocol smuggling
- DNS rebinding
Beyond OWASP Top 10
- WebSocket security
- GraphQL-specific attacks (introspection, batching, DoS)
- API-specific vulnerabilities
- Client-side attacks (XSS, DOM clobbering, prototype pollution)
- File upload vulnerabilities
- XXE (XML External Entity)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 86 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5962d7fe2607
pentest-web is a command published in the GitHub repository JoasASantos/ClaudeAdvancedPlugins (154 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 497 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.