A command that checks one software requirement for clarity, testability, and completeness. Testability means that someone can verify whether the requirement has been met.

Use it with a requirement ID to identify issues, suggest improved wording, add acceptance criteria, or approve the requirement.

It helps find ambiguous or missing details before the requirement guides development.

How joemooney/r4w configures Claude Code

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to joemooney/r4w. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file

curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joemooney/r4w/master/.claude/commands/review.md

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joemooney/r4w

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/joemooney/r4w/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/joemooney/r4w/review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/joemooney/r4w/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/joemooney/r4w/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/joemooney/r4w/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/joemooney/r4w/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 239 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00000	$0.00239
Opus 5.5	$0.00000	$0.00096
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00000	$0.00048
Haiku 4.5	$0.00000	$0.00024

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 4ebc1bb7a878, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/review.md · 44 lines

What it actually says

Review Requirement

Review a specific requirement for quality and completeness.

Usage

Invoke with: /review <SPEC-ID>

Instructions

Load the requirement: aida show $ARGUMENTS
Evaluate the requirement for:
- Clarity: Is it unambiguous?
- Testability: Can it be verified?
- Completeness: Does it have all necessary information?
Suggest improvements if needed
Offer to update the requirement with suggested changes

Output Format

## Review: [SPEC-ID] - [Title]

### Quality Assessment
- Clarity: X/10
- Testability: X/10
- Completeness: X/10

### Issues Found
- Issue 1
- Issue 2

### Suggested Improvements
[Improved description text]

### Actions
- [ ] Update description
- [ ] Add acceptance criteria
- [ ] Approve requirement

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

2mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4ebc1bb7a878

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository joemooney/r4w (5 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 239 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Planning

review next to 6 commands from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
reviewjoemooney/r4w	Command	5	8mo ago	MIT	A	0	Claude Code
checklistgithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	yesterday	MIT	A	13	Claude Code
clarifygithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	yesterday	MIT	A	27	Claude Code
specifygithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	yesterday	MIT	A	13	Claude Code
analyzegithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	yesterday	MIT	A	26	Claude Code
convergegithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	yesterday	MIT	A	35	Claude Code
implementgithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	yesterday	MIT	A	14	Claude Code

r4w: Command for Claude Code