Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/jonase47/ccpr/gate-p7-businessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonase47/ccprWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/gate-p7-business)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/gate-p7-business"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/gate-p7-business.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00965 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00483 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
gate-p7-business scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/gate-p7-business – Business Readiness Check
Checks business readiness: documentation, GTM, KPIs, legal mandatory documents.
Argument: $ARGUMENTS = not applicable
Gate commands do not accept arguments.
Prerequisites
docs/launch/LAUNCH.md(phase index) existsdocs/launch/RELEASE_DOCS.md(summary + links) with frontmatterstatus: activedocs/launch/GTM.md(or marked as not applicable for hobby projects)- Repo-root files:
RELEASE_NOTES.md,USER_GUIDE.md,PRIVACY_POLICY.md,LEGAL_NOTICE.md(latter two only required for public hosting)
Agent
- Type: business-analyst
- Model: sonnet
Pre-Flight
If docs/.gate-preflight-p7.md exists and is less than 10 minutes old, read it as a starting point. Mechanical checks (file existence, sections) are already done – focus on content evaluation.
Context (Orchestrator prepares)
Read the phase index first, then load detail files only when their status row signals an open issue:
- From
docs/launch/LAUNCH.md: status, key decisions, open risks (entry point) - From
docs/launch/RELEASE_DOCS.md: which release docs exist and whether legal review is still pending - From
docs/launch/GTM.md: KPI status and 30/60/90-day targets (or note "not applicable") - From
docs/concept/CONCEPT.md(P1 phase index, optional): project type (hobby vs. business) - Repo-root files for content checks:
RELEASE_NOTES.md,USER_GUIDE.md,PRIVACY_POLICY.md,LEGAL_NOTICE.md - From the global CLAUDE.md: hosting type (local vs. public)
Prompt Template
Goal: Business readiness check for Gate P7.
Business Documents: [inline summaries]
Output Format:
Checklist (max. 6 items): | # | Check | Status | Reason | Status: Fulfilled / Partially / Not fulfilled / Not applicable
Business go-live assessment:
- Ready / Conditionally ready / Not ready
- Reason (2-3 sentences)
- Conditions (if conditional, as numbered list)
Constraints:
- ONLY business evaluation, NO technical check
- For hobby projects: rate GTM and pricing as "Not applicable"
- Legal notice only required for public hosting
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +3 lines d39efaef8ee6
- 5d ago First seen · 78 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5916a3fc3ebd
gate-p7-business is a command published in the GitHub repository jonase47/ccpr (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 965 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
compliance
Generate compliance-as-code policies with automated evidence. Usage - /mindforge:compliance [--framework soc2|hipaa|pci] [--engine opa|sentinel].
mindforge:fintech
Design fintech payment/ledger architecture. Usage: /mindforge:fintech [service] [--domain payments|ledger|kyc] [--compliance pci|sox].
mindforge:healthcare
Design HIPAA-compliant healthcare system architecture. Usage: /mindforge:healthcare [service] [--standard hipaa|hl7|fhir] [--scope full|audit].
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.
india-checklist
Interactive non-code compliance checklist — business registration, DPO, GST, CERT-In, grievance officer, and more.