p3-sec-data

p3-sec-data is a command for coding agents from jonase47/ccpr. It costs 0 tokens per session (867 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A data-protection plan for encryption, secret storage, and backup security.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define protection for data in transit and at rest, secret rotation, and backup encryption and retention.
Why use it?
It addresses how sensitive data and recovery copies should be protected from exposure or misuse.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/jonase47/ccpr/p3-sec-data
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonase47/ccpr

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for p3-sec-data

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p3-sec-data.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p3-sec-data)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p3-sec-data"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p3-sec-data.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 867 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00867
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00434
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00173
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00087

Measured yesterday against content hash 58dab5bf33e8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

p3-sec-data scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/p3-sec-data.md · 88 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/p3-sec-data – Data Security Concept

Defines encryption (transit/rest), secrets management and backup security.

Argument: $ARGUMENTS = [Focus, e.g. "Encryption", "Secrets", "Backup"]

If provided: Deep-dive the named area. If not provided: Create complete data security concept.

Prerequisites

  • ARCHITECTURE.md and threat model exist
  • DATA_MODEL.md exists (if database is present)

Agent

  • Type: security-master
  • Model: sonnet

Context (Orchestrator prepares)

Orchestrator reads beforehand and delivers inline:

  • From SECURITY.md: Threat model (information disclosure rows)
  • From DATA_MODEL.md: Data fields requiring protection (if available)
  • From TECH_STACK.md: Database/hosting in use

Prompt Template

Goal: Define data security measures for the project.

Context: [inline from SECURITY.md, DATA_MODEL.md]

Output Format:

  1. Encryption in transit: TLS version, HSTS (1-2 sentences)
  2. Encryption at rest: Table | Data Field | Encryption | Method |
  3. Secrets management: where are secrets stored, how are they rotated?
  4. Backup security: encryption, retention

Constraints:

  • ONLY data security, NO auth concept, NO API security
  • Measures proportional to project risk
  • Max. 8 encrypted fields in the table

Orchestrator Checkpoint

  • All sensitive fields from DATA_MODEL.md covered?
  • Secrets strategy concrete (not just "use a vault")?

Write Detail File

Write the result to docs/architecture/DATA_SECURITY.md (overwrite if it exists). Start with this YAML frontmatter:

---
phase: P3
subskill: sec-data
status: active
last_updated: <DD.MM.YYYY>
---

Body sections: ## Encryption in Transit, ## Encryption at Rest (the field/encryption/method table), ## Secrets Management, ## Backup Security.

Update Sub-Index

Update docs/architecture/SECURITY.md:

  • Set **Last Updated:** <DD.MM.YYYY>.
  • In its Detail Files table: ensure a row for [DATA_SECURITY.md](DATA_SECURITY.md) with status complete.
  • Lift the secrets-management decision and any field that is not encrypted-at-rest despite being sensitive into Key Decisions / Open Risks of the sub-index.
  • Do not edit ARCHITECTURE.md directly.

Read the full file on GitHub · 88 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 88 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 58dab5bf33e8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

p3-sec-data is a command published in the GitHub repository jonase47/ccpr (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 867 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.