p6-exploratory

p6-exploratory is a command for coding agents from jonase47/ccpr. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,581 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Conducts unstructured, experience-based tests that automated tests and defined test cases do not cover. The goal is to find unexpected behaviours, usability issues, and hidden bugs that remain invisible in structured testing.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-exploratory
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonase47/ccpr

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for p6-exploratory

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-exploratory.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-exploratory)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-exploratory"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-exploratory.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,581 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.01581
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00790
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00316
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00158

Measured today against content hash eb286e9d1ba7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

p6-exploratory scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/p6-exploratory.md · 128 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/p6-exploratory – Exploratory Tests

Conducts unstructured, experience-based tests that automated tests and defined test cases do not cover. The goal is to find unexpected behaviours, usability issues, and hidden bugs that remain invisible in structured testing.

Argument: $ARGUMENTS = [focus area, e.g. "form validation", "mobile usage", "error handling"]

If provided: Focus exploratory tests on the specified area. If not provided: Read FEATURES.md and TESTPROTOCOL_FUNCTIONAL.md and select areas that have received little test attention so far. If any context is missing, ask about the application area.

0. Work-item adoption guard (ADR-0002 §8)

Usability findings from this command are optional backlog items (see Result) — this guard only applies if the user chooses to capture one.

Run python3 ~/.claude/scripts/workitems.py list.

  • Non-empty array → the project uses the structured store. If the user opts to capture a usability finding as a backlog item, use the CLI (step 3 below) instead of BACKLOG.md prose.
  • [] and no docs/workitems/ directory → still on prose. Append to BACKLOG.md as before, if chosen. Emit one line: "Tip: run lift to adopt the structured work-item store."
  • [] but docs/workitems/ exists → adopted store, just empty right now. Treat as adopted: use the CLI, not the prose fallback.

See Manual/WORKITEMS.md §8 for the full guard rationale and the status-verb mapping.

Execution

1. Read Context

Read the following files (if present):

  • TESTPROTOCOL_FUNCTIONAL.md (what has already been tested → identify gaps)
  • USER_JOURNEYS.md (personas as test perspectives)
  • UX_CONCEPT.md (UX expectations – does the real behaviour deviate?)
  • FEATURES.md (full scope of the application)

2. Delegation to QA-Tester Agent (Lead)

Delegate the exploratory tests to the qa-tester agent:

Run exploratory tests for: $ARGUMENTS Context: [Insert previous test results from TESTPROTOCOL_FUNCTIONAL.md, personas from USER_JOURNEYS.md]

Exploratory tests follow no fixed script. Instead, use the following heuristics and techniques:

A. Perspective Shifts Test from different user perspectives:

  • Experienced user: Fast, unexpected actions (double-clicking, rapid scrolling, multiple tabs)
  • Impatient user: Clicking buttons multiple times, abandoning forms, navigating back
  • Curious user: All edge menus, hidden features, unusual combinations
  • Error-prone user: Invalid inputs, very long texts, special characters, emojis, SQL injections

B. Explore State Boundaries

  • What happens with empty states (no data, fresh account)?
  • What happens with large amounts of data (performance, layout)?
  • What happens during transitions between states (simultaneous actions)?
  • What happens with interrupted actions (navigation mid-process)?

C. Technical Edge Cases

  • Behaviour on slow connections / timeout
  • Behaviour when external services are unavailable
  • Behaviour with browser back button in critical flows
  • Behaviour on session expiry mid-action

D. Usability Observations Also document observations that are not bugs but impair the user experience:

  • Confusing error messages
  • Unclear states (is the page still loading? Was the action successful?)
  • Inconsistent behaviour between similar features

For each finding: description, reproduction steps, severity, category (Bug / Usability / Enhancement)

Read the full file on GitHub · 128 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 128 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A eb286e9d1ba7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

p6-exploratory is a command published in the GitHub repository jonase47/ccpr (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,581 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.