p6-func-e2e

p6-func-e2e is a command for coding agents from jonase47/ccpr. It costs 0 tokens per session (852 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Tests critical user journeys end-to-end – from start to the expected final result.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-func-e2e
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonase47/ccpr

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for p6-func-e2e

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-func-e2e.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-func-e2e)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-func-e2e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/p6-func-e2e.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 852 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00852
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00426
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00170
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00085

Measured today against content hash 4329a716914e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

p6-func-e2e scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/p6-func-e2e.md · 88 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/p6-func-e2e – E2E Tests for Critical Paths

Tests critical user journeys end-to-end – from start to the expected final result.

Argument: $ARGUMENTS = [journey/feature]

If provided: Test the specified journey. If not provided: Ask about the paths to be tested.

Prerequisites

  • Integration tests passed (/p6-func-integration)
  • USER_JOURNEYS.md and TEST_STRATEGY.md present

Agent

  • Type: qa-tester
  • Model: sonnet

Context (Orchestrator prepares)

Orchestrator reads in advance and delivers inline:

  • From USER_JOURNEYS.md: The journey to be tested (exact steps)
  • From TEST_STRATEGY.md: Defined critical E2E paths

Prompt Template

Goal: Run E2E tests for: [journey/feature]

User Journey: [inline from USER_JOURNEYS.md]

Output Format: A step-by-step table per journey:

Step Action Expected Actual Status

Overall result: PASSED / FAILED

Constraints:

  • E2E tests ONLY (no unit, no integration tests)
  • Test from the user's perspective, not from the code perspective
  • Max. 5 journeys per run

Orchestrator Checkpoint

  • All critical paths from TEST_STRATEGY.md covered?
  • Failed steps clearly documented?

Write Detail File

Write the result to docs/quality/func_e2e.md (overwrite). Frontmatter:

---
phase: P6
subskill: func-e2e
status: active
last_updated: <DD.MM.YYYY>
---

Body sections: ## Scope, ## Test Results (table per journey), ## Failures Summary.

Update Sub-Index

Update docs/quality/FUNCTIONAL.md (the functional-testing sub-index, created by /p6-functional if missing):

  • Set **Last Updated:** <DD.MM.YYYY>.
  • In its Detail Files table: ensure a row for [func_e2e.md](func_e2e.md) with status complete (or needs-rework if blocking failures exist).
  • Lift any blocking journey failure into Open Risks of the sub-index.
  • Do not edit QA.md directly.

Handover Epilogue

Before writing. docs/HANDOVER.md is capped — the file states its own limit in its header (default: ≤5 KB / ~150 lines). Two rules follow from that, and neither is optional:

  • Replace this command's previous epilogue block, do not append a second one. Stacking is what pushes the file over; one skill run has been measured adding 1021 B, ~20 % of the cap.
  • If the file is already near its cap, shorten before you add. Reading the cap sentence is not the same as measuring: check the actual size, and when there is no room, condense existing content or hand the user /cleanup instead of growing the file further.

Read the full file on GitHub · 88 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 88 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4329a716914e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

p6-func-e2e is a command published in the GitHub repository jonase47/ccpr (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 852 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.