Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonase47/ccprWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/track)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/track/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jonase47/ccpr/track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jonase47/ccpr/track.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00465 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00186 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
track scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Track Commands (cross-cutting, 6 commands)
Entry-point and cross-cutting commands. /track-decision runs first; the others compose Lean-Track / Full-Track / consistency checks.
| Command | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
/track-decision |
Decide Lean vs. Full-Track (or reassess) | Prerequisite check + Knockout (K1–K5) + Indicator score (I1–I5). Determines Lean (prototype/PoC/spike) or Full (P0–P8). Also for mid-flight reassessment. No downgrade Full → Lean. |
/constitution |
Create or revise the project Constitution | Creates docs/CONSTITUTION.md with Inviolable/Default/Aspirational. Hybrid mode: greenfield with domain bootstrap, existing Full-Track reads phase docs, Lean precursor reads FRAME. Read as mandatory input by all gates. |
/lean-frame |
Create Lean-Track Single-Source-of-Truth | Creates docs/FRAME.md (max. 5 KB, 8 sections) + docs/CLAUDE-lean.md. Replaces the P0+P1+P3 conception work for prototypes. |
/lean-learn |
Validate Lean-Track and make a decision | Creates docs/LEARNINGS.md with hypothesis check and decision PROMOTE/PIVOT-soft/PIVOT-hard/DROP. On pivot: module table (keep/refactor/rebuild). |
/lean-promote |
Promote Lean → Full-Track via Promotion Brief | Creates docs/PROMOTION_BRIEF.md (7 sections) as bootstrap input for /project-init. Archives FRAME/LEARNINGS/CLAUDE-lean to docs/lean-archive/. |
/cross-check |
Cross-Artifact Consistency Check Across Phases | Checks inconsistencies across phases (features ↔ auth, NFR ↔ tests, ADRs ↔ Constitution, …). 7 rules initially, growing iteratively. Recommended before gates. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 9bbfe327e925
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f342a8699e38
track is a command published in the GitHub repository jonase47/ccpr (1 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 465 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
setup
Interview me and scaffold my personal chief-of-staff system (context file, memory, task list, daily brief).
brief
Produce my morning brief — what's on today, what's slipping, what to prep, one thing worth my attention.
loops
Weekly review — surface everything in-flight and force a ship / block / kill decision on each.
todo.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
sdd
Spec-driven dev loop. Plan once, then dev↔test↔eval loop until PRP spec satisfied. Local only, no PR.
golden-path
The golden path. One command, idea to merged PR. Runs the full pipeline, prd → prp → plan → dev → test → pr, with sensor + eval gates at every stage.