Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joonlab/joonlab-claudecode-setting-for-shareWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/joonlab/joonlab-claudecode-setting-for-share/pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/joonlab/joonlab-claudecode-setting-for-share/pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/joonlab/joonlab-claudecode-setting-for-share/pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/joonlab/joonlab-claudecode-setting-for-share/pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/joonlab/joonlab-claudecode-setting-for-share/pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00986 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00197 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Pipeline Command
에이전트 파이프라인 실행 요청입니다.
요청 분석
입력: $ARGUMENTS
파이프라인 파싱
입력에서 ->로 구분된 에이전트 체인을 파싱:
- 예:
generator -> validator -> fixer= 3단계 파이프라인 - 마지막
->이후 에이전트가 아닌 텍스트는 컨텍스트로 처리
실행 지침
Step 1: 파이프라인 분석
각 에이전트의 역할과 데이터 흐름을 분석:
- 각 단계의 입력/출력 정의
- 의존 관계 확인
- 병렬 가능 구간 식별
Step 2: 실행 계획 출력 (필수!)
파이프라인 실행 계획
파이프라인: $ARGUMENTS
총 단계: N개
데이터 흐름
[입력/컨텍스트]
│
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Stage 1: agent-name-1 │
│ ─────────────────────────────────│
│ 입력: 사용자 요청 │
│ 처리: {작업 설명} │
│ 출력: {출력 형태} │
└──────────────┬───────────────────┘
│ 결과 전달
▼
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Stage 2: agent-name-2 │
│ ─────────────────────────────────│
│ 입력: Stage 1 결과 │
│ 처리: {작업 설명} │
│ 출력: {출력 형태} │
└──────────────┬───────────────────┘
│
▼
[최종 결과]
예상 흐름
| Stage | 에이전트 | 작업 | 예상 결과 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | agent-1 |
작업 설명 | 출력물 설명 |
| 2 | agent-2 |
작업 설명 | 출력물 설명 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
Step 3: 순차 실행
각 단계를 순서대로 실행하며, 이전 단계의 결과를 다음 단계의 프롬프트에 포함:
Stage 1 실행:
Task(subagent_type="agent-1", prompt="[초기 컨텍스트]", description="Stage 1: ...")
Stage 2 실행 (Stage 1 완료 후):
Task(subagent_type="agent-2", prompt="이전 단계 결과:\n{stage1_result}\n\n다음 작업: ...", description="Stage 2: ...")
Step 4: 중간 결과 보고
각 단계 완료 시:
## Stage N 완료: agent-name
**상태**: 성공 / 실패
**결과 요약**: ...
**다음 단계로 전달**: ...
---
Stage N+1 시작...
Step 5: 파이프라인 완료 보고
## 파이프라인 실행 완료
### 실행 요약
| Stage | 에이전트 | 상태 | 주요 결과 |
|:-----:|----------|:----:|-----------|
| 1 | agent-1 | ✅ | 결과 요약 |
| 2 | agent-2 | ✅ | 결과 요약 |
### 최종 결과
{마지막 단계의 결과물}
### 후속 작업 제안
- 필요시 추가 작업 제안
특수 문법
병렬 단계 (쉼표)
/pipeline [generator, analyzer] -> validator
= generator와 analyzer를 병렬 실행 후, 둘 다 완료되면 validator 실행
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 160 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 1a72688deb57
pipeline is a command published in the GitHub repository joonlab/joonlab-claudecode-setting-for-share (14 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 986 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
pipeline compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pipelinejoonlab/joonlab-claudecode-setting-for-share | Command | 14 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |