A command for simulating a peer-review report by checking an academic draft against its primary sources.

Use it to write a structured review, verify every claim against source texts, record objections, and prepare the next revision step.

It prevents the draft from validating itself and exposes inaccurate quotations, weak evidence, unsupported connections, and overly broad claims.

review — Command for Claude Code by josefslerka/study-kit

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/josefslerka/study-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/josefslerka/study-kit/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/josefslerka/study-kit/review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/josefslerka/study-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/josefslerka/study-kit/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/josefslerka/study-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/josefslerka/study-kit/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 25 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 401 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00025	$0.00401
Opus 5.5	$0.00010	$0.00160
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00005	$0.00080
Haiku 4.5	$0.00003	$0.00040

Measured 2mo ago against content hash e611f92b78c8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cs/.claude/commands/review.md · 21 lines

What it actually says

Proveď fázi 4.3 dle CLAUDE.md.

KLÍČOVÉ: konfrontuj draft ze study/ PROTI primárním textům v raw_primary/. Draft NEBER jako zdroj pravdy — tvůj výtvor nesmí validovat sám sebe. U každého tvrzení draftu ověř, zda sedí s raw_primary/.

Tři tvrdé kontroly proveď VŽDY:

věrnost citátů (doslovnost + kontiguita; pravidlo 1),
frekvence „důkazů" (grep; pravidlo 9),
spoje, ne cihly — syntetický spoj jádra stojí na pojmu, ne na shodě slov (pravidlo 8). A zvlášť prověř ohraničení teze (pravidlo 8b): je některý text, na který se teze nerozšíří, „zachráněn" vývojovým příběhem nebo „výjimkou, co potvrzuje pravidlo"? Pokud ano, je to námitka — správné ohraničení je ověření na protikladu (chybí předpoklad → chybí účinek).

Napiš posudek: shrnutí, původní příspěvek, silné stránky, hlavní námitky (popis + požadavek

závažnost), drobné připomínky, verdikt, a 1 nejdůležitější větu. U námitek ukaž, kde se draft míjí s raw_primary/. Zapiš process/posudek.md, zaloguj, navrhni /revize.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

2mo ago First seen · 21 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A e611f92b78c8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository josefslerka/study-kit (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 401 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Research

review next to 6 commands from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
reviewjosefslerka/study-kit	Command	7	4mo ago	MIT	A	25	Claude Code
checklistgithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	today	MIT	A	13	Claude Code
clarifygithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	today	MIT	A	27	Claude Code
specifygithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	today	MIT	A	13	Claude Code
analyzegithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	today	MIT	A	26	Claude Code
convergegithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	today	MIT	A	35	Claude Code
implementgithub/spec-kit	Command	148k	today	MIT	A	14	Claude Code