Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/josefslerka/study-kit/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/josefslerka/study-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00401 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Proveď fázi 4.3 dle CLAUDE.md.
KLÍČOVÉ: konfrontuj draft ze study/ PROTI primárním textům v raw_primary/. Draft NEBER
jako zdroj pravdy — tvůj výtvor nesmí validovat sám sebe. U každého tvrzení draftu ověř,
zda sedí s raw_primary/.
Tři tvrdé kontroly proveď VŽDY:
- věrnost citátů (doslovnost + kontiguita; pravidlo 1),
- frekvence „důkazů" (grep; pravidlo 9),
- spoje, ne cihly — syntetický spoj jádra stojí na pojmu, ne na shodě slov (pravidlo 8). A zvlášť prověř ohraničení teze (pravidlo 8b): je některý text, na který se teze nerozšíří, „zachráněn" vývojovým příběhem nebo „výjimkou, co potvrzuje pravidlo"? Pokud ano, je to námitka — správné ohraničení je ověření na protikladu (chybí předpoklad → chybí účinek).
Napiš posudek: shrnutí, původní příspěvek, silné stránky, hlavní námitky (popis + požadavek
- závažnost), drobné připomínky, verdikt, a 1 nejdůležitější větu. U námitek ukaž, kde se
draft míjí s
raw_primary/. Zapišprocess/posudek.md, zaloguj, navrhni/revize.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 21 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A e611f92b78c8
review is a command published in the GitHub repository josefslerka/study-kit (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 401 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.