Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JSMike/ai-workflow-starternpx agentmods add commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/issueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.02956 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00591 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00296 |
Grade A, and why
issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 455 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Issue Management
Manage the issue tracking system in .issues/. This command is portable and can bootstrap issue tracking in any repository.
Usage: /issue <action> [arguments]
Actions
init
Initialize the .issues/ folder structure in a new project.
- Create
.issues/directory - Create
.issues/README.mdwith conventions documentation (template below) - Create empty
.issues/index.mdwith header
README.md Template:
# Issue Tracking
This folder contains issue tracking for the repository. Each issue has its own folder with documentation.
Canonical workflow rules live in `../AGENTS.md`. Keep this file focused on `.issues/` folder conventions.
## Structure
Each `ISSUE-N/` folder contains:
- `issue.md` - Requirements and metadata (always present)
- `plan.md` - Implementation approach (created when planning)
- `session-log.md` - Append-only session progress records
- `qa-instructions.md` - Step-by-step human validation guide (created when moving to review)
- `summary.md` - Final completion record (created after verification)
## Status Values
| Status | Meaning |
|--------|---------|
| idea | Captured thought, exploration, or vague request; not yet scoped |
| backlog | Scoped but not ready to work |
| ready | Ready to work, dependencies met, acceptance criteria clear |
| in-progress | Currently being worked on |
| review | Implementation complete, awaiting verification |
| done | Verified working and accepted |
## Metadata Fields
| Field | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| Status | Current status (see above) |
| Owner | Agent / TBD / person name |
| Created | Date created (YYYY-MM-DD) |
| Source | Origin category (design-review, bug-report, etc.) |
| External | External ticket reference (optional) |
| Blocks | Issues this blocks (optional) |
| Blocked-by | Issues blocking this (optional) |
| Priority | high / medium / low |
## Commands
Use `/issue <action>` to manage issues:
- `init` - Initialize this folder structure
- `create <title>` - Create new issue
- `match <description>` - Find existing issues matching a description
- `work <id>` - Start working on an issue
- `list [status]` - Show issues
- `show <id>` - Display issue details
- `status <id> <status>` - Update status
- `plan <id>` - Create/update plan
- `session <id>` - Append session progress (run at end of each work session or before handoff)
- `done <id>` - Mark verified work complete with comprehensive summary
- `delete <id>` - Remove issue
- `index` - Regenerate index.md
## Lifecycle
1. Clarify vague requests before creating implementation-ready issues
2. Create issue with `/issue create`
3. Plan implementation, add plan.md
4. Work on issue, update status to `in-progress`
5. **After each work session or before handoff, run `/issue session` to append progress to `session-log.md`** (mandatory)
6. When implementation is complete, create `qa-instructions.md` and set status to `review`
7. After verification, run `/issue done` for final summary
8. After PR merge, run `/issue delete`
**Important:** Session log entries are mandatory for each work session or handoff point, not optional. One entry can cover multiple related edits in the same uninterrupted work session. The audit trail depends on consistent session recording.
## Session Log Template
Append each work session to `ISSUE-N/session-log.md` using this structure:
- `# Session N`
- `**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD`
- `**Prompt/Ask:**` Briefly state the user request that triggered this work.
- `## Completed`
- `## Current Status`
- `## Plan Coverage`
- `## Files Changed`
- `## Verification`
- `## Next Steps`
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 455 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 0953878dcf84
issue is a command published in the GitHub repository JSMike/ai-workflow-starter (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 2,956 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
issue compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| issueJSMike/ai-workflow-starter | Command | 2 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 8 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |