Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JSMike/ai-workflow-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jsmike/ai-workflow-starter/workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.01846 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00738 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00369 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow Assistant
Helps ensure the issue tracking workflow is followed correctly. Canonical rules live in AGENTS.md; every actionable task in this repository must be tracked in .issues/.
Usage: /workflow [action]
Actions
(no action) - Overview
Display the complete workflow with current context. Show:
- Any in-progress issues from
.issues/index.md - The workflow steps
- Reminders about mandatory session-log entries
start
Begin work properly. Follow this checklist:
-
Understand the request - What is the user asking for, and is it clear enough to plan?
-
Clarify vague requests:
- Restate the likely goal
- Identify missing requirements, constraints, acceptance criteria, and non-goals
- Ask targeted clarifying questions before creating an implementation-ready issue
-
Check for existing issues:
/issue match <description of the work>- If match found → Use
/issue work <id>to continue - If no match → Use
/issue create <title>to start new
- If match found → Use
-
If continuing existing issue:
- Read the issue.md for requirements
- Read the plan.md for approach
- Read the latest
session-log.mdentry for where we left off - Update status to
in-progressif not already
-
If creating new issue:
- Use
ideafor exploration or vague requests - Use
readyonly when requirements and acceptance criteria are clear enough to implement - Plan file is at
.issues/ISSUE-N/plan.md
- Use
-
Confirm tracking:
- Display: "Working on ISSUE-N: "
- Display: "Remember to run
/issue session ISSUE-Nafter completing work"
check
Verify the workflow is being followed. Check:
-
Is there an active issue?
- Scan
.issues/*/issue.mdforin-progressstatus - If none, warn: "No issue in progress - run
/workflow start"
- Scan
-
Is the current work related to an issue?
- Compare recent file changes to issue acceptance criteria
- Warn if work appears untracked
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 247 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 79304e549e88
workflow is a command published in the GitHub repository JSMike/ai-workflow-starter (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 1,846 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
workflow compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| workflowJSMike/ai-workflow-starter | Command | 2 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 6 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |