Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/juanmhidalgo/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins/implement-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins/implement-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins/implement-fix.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01272 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00636 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00254 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
implement-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
- Branch: !
git branch --show-current - Date: !
date +%Y-%m-%d
Instructions
Step 1: Load Fixes File
Find and read the review fixes file:
- First, check for
REVIEW_FIXES.mdin the project root - If not found, use Grep to search for files containing
type: review-fixesin*.mdfiles - If no fixes file exists, inform user to run
/code-review:fixes-planfirst
Step 2: Determine Scope
Based on $ARGUMENTS:
- Number (e.g., "3") → Implement specific issue #3
- "all" → Implement all pending issues
- Empty → Show pending issues and ask which to implement
Step 3: Analyze Each Issue
For each issue to implement:
-
Read the issue details:
- File path and line numbers
- Problem description
- Suggested solution
-
Read the current code:
- Understand the context
- Check if issue still exists (may have been fixed already)
-
Classify the fix:
Simple fixes (implement directly):
- Typos, formatting
- Missing imports
- Obvious null checks
- Documentation updates
Decision-required fixes (ASK FIRST):
- Multiple valid approaches exist
- Architectural implications
- Adding dependencies
- Performance trade-offs
- Breaking changes
- Security-related changes
Step 4: For Decision-Required Fixes
STOP and ask before implementing:
This fix requires a decision:
**Issue #X:** [Brief description]
**Options:**
1. [Approach A]
- Pros: ...
- Cons: ...
2. [Approach B]
- Pros: ...
- Cons: ...
**Recommendation:** [Your suggestion] because [reasoning]
Which approach do you prefer?
Wait for user response before implementing.
Step 5: Implement the Fix
- Make the code change:
- Use Edit tool for modifications
- Follow existing code patterns
- Keep changes minimal and focused
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 195 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A e3f34212c157
implement-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository juanmhidalgo/claude-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,272 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
review-sdk-app
Review and validate a Claude Agent SDK application against best practices.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.