Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jubayertalha/vibeframeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/jubayertalha/vibeframe/review-drift)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jubayertalha/vibeframe/review-drift"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jubayertalha/vibeframe/review-drift/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/jubayertalha/vibeframe/review-drift"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/jubayertalha/vibeframe/review-drift.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00286 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00143 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
review-drift scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review and resolve open VibeFrame drift findings.
vibe_query kind=drift— open findings with evidence, most recent first.- For each finding, examine the evidence (files and lines are exact — the validator is
deterministic and does not guess):
- divergence / constraint-violation: decide whether the code or the declared design
is right. Fix the code, or declare the dependency/constraint change (and
vibe_decidewhy) so the model matches reality. - absence: implement the missing step, or remove/adjust the declared step if it was over-planned.
- broken-binding: re-link with
vibe_linkusing the candidates in the evidence. - orphan: assign the file to a component (
vibe_link component=<id> file=<glob>) or leave it and recommend dismissal if it is genuinely outside the architecture.
- divergence / constraint-violation: decide whether the code or the declared design
is right. Fix the code, or declare the dependency/constraint change (and
- After changes,
vibe_validateto confirm findings close (they auto-resolve when no longer detected). - Report anything that needs a human verdict (accept-as-new-intent or dismiss) with your recommendation — those verbs belong to the human in the browser UI.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 22 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 4fb07081ca90
review-drift is a command published in the GitHub repository jubayertalha/vibeframe (0 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 286 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sruja-bugfix-triage
Systematic workflow for triaging and fixing bugs with architecture grounding.
xray
Zero-config X-ray of this repo's real architecture — map, living docs, and evolution feed. No rules required.
check
Fail on NET-NEW architecture violations only — the same ratchet ArchSteer runs in CI, run right now.
parallax-status
Summarize the current session and run package/native lifecycle diagnostics.
debug
Systematic debugging: reproduce, isolate, hypothesize, fix, verify, document.
api-aqa-flow-execution-and-report-analysis
Phase 6 Execution & Report Analysis of api-aqa-flow (USER INTERACTION REQUIRED).