Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Justdvp/claude-code-templatesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/justdvp/claude-code-templates/auth)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/justdvp/claude-code-templates/auth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/justdvp/claude-code-templates/auth/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/justdvp/claude-code-templates/auth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/justdvp/claude-code-templates/auth.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.05021 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.02008 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01004 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00502 |
Grade A, and why
auth scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- auth — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 776 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
FastAPI Authentication & Authorization
Complete authentication system with JWT tokens, OAuth2, and role-based access control.
Usage
# Install auth dependencies
pip install python-jose[cryptography] passlib[bcrypt] python-multipart
# Generate secret key
openssl rand -hex 32
JWT Configuration
# app/core/security.py
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from typing import Optional, Union, Any
from jose import JWTError, jwt
from passlib.context import CryptContext
from app.core.config import settings
# Password hashing
pwd_context = CryptContext(schemes=["bcrypt"], deprecated="auto")
# JWT settings
SECRET_KEY = settings.SECRET_KEY
ALGORITHM = "HS256"
ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES = 30
REFRESH_TOKEN_EXPIRE_DAYS = 7
def create_access_token(
subject: Union[str, Any],
expires_delta: Optional[timedelta] = None
) -> str:
"""Create JWT access token."""
if expires_delta:
expire = datetime.utcnow() + expires_delta
else:
expire = datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(minutes=ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES)
to_encode = {"exp": expire, "sub": str(subject), "type": "access"}
encoded_jwt = jwt.encode(to_encode, SECRET_KEY, algorithm=ALGORITHM)
return encoded_jwt
def create_refresh_token(subject: Union[str, Any]) -> str:
"""Create JWT refresh token."""
expire = datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(days=REFRESH_TOKEN_EXPIRE_DAYS)
to_encode = {"exp": expire, "sub": str(subject), "type": "refresh"}
encoded_jwt = jwt.encode(to_encode, SECRET_KEY, algorithm=ALGORITHM)
return encoded_jwt
def verify_password(plain_password: str, hashed_password: str) -> bool:
"""Verify password against hash."""
return pwd_context.verify(plain_password, hashed_password)
def get_password_hash(password: str) -> str:
"""Generate password hash."""
return pwd_context.hash(password)
def decode_token(token: str) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Decode and verify JWT token."""
try:
payload = jwt.decode(token, SECRET_KEY, algorithms=[ALGORITHM])
return payload
except JWTError:
return None
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 776 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 66b7265094e9
auth is a command published in the GitHub repository Justdvp/claude-code-templates (7 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 5,021 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
toh-connect
Connect app to Supabase backend with schema and RLS policies.
design-api
Design a RESTful or GraphQL API based on the project's domain model and requirements.
generate-api-ref
Generate API reference documentation from source code and route definitions.
api
Endpoints are relative to /api/0/ — the prefix is added automatically. Absolute HTTP(S) Sentry URLs also work; their origin is validated against your authenticated host.
api-documentation
Generate comprehensive API documentation for FastAPI endpoints.
dare-laravel-api
Padrões DARE para APIs REST em Laravel 11 + PHP 8.3. Strict Types, FormRequests, Services, Resources, Repositories, Eloquent + casts, tratamento global de exceções, testes Pest, PHPStan/Larastan nível 8.