Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KaimingWan/oh-my-kiroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kaimingwan/oh-my-kiro/lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kaimingwan/oh-my-kiro/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kaimingwan/oh-my-kiro/lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kaimingwan/oh-my-kiro/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kaimingwan/oh-my-kiro/lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00495 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00198 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run these health checks and report results:
1. CLAUDE.md Line Count
LINES=$(wc -l < CLAUDE.md | tr -d ' ')
[ "$LINES" -lt 500 ] && echo "✅ CLAUDE.md: $LINES lines (< 500)" || echo "❌ CLAUDE.md: $LINES lines (≥ 500 — trim it)"
2. .claude/rules/ File Sizes
for f in .claude/rules/*.md; do
LINES=$(wc -l < "$f" | tr -d ' ')
NAME=$(basename "$f")
[ "$LINES" -lt 200 ] && echo "✅ $NAME: $LINES lines" || echo "❌ $NAME: $LINES lines (≥ 200)"
done
3. Layer Headers
for f in .claude/rules/*.md; do
NAME=$(basename "$f")
grep -q 'Layer: Agent Rule' "$f" && echo "✅ $NAME has header" || echo "❌ $NAME missing Layer header"
done
4. CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md Sync
diff CLAUDE.md AGENTS.md && echo "✅ CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md in sync" || echo "❌ CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md out of sync — run: cp CLAUDE.md AGENTS.md"
5. Duplication Check
DUPS=0
for f in .claude/rules/*.md; do
while IFS= read -r line; do
[ -z "$line" ] && continue
echo "$line" | grep -q '^#' && continue
if grep -qF "$line" knowledge/rules.md 2>/dev/null; then
echo "⚠️ Duplicate: $line"
DUPS=$((DUPS + 1))
fi
done < "$f"
done
[ "$DUPS" -eq 0 ] && echo "✅ No verbatim duplication" || echo "❌ $DUPS duplicated lines between .claude/rules/ and knowledge/rules.md"
Report all results. If any ❌, list recommended fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 59e12c391eb0
lint is a command published in the GitHub repository KaimingWan/oh-my-kiro (107 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 495 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
lint compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lintKaimingWan/oh-my-kiro | Command | 107 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |