Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Kandil7/prprompts-flutter-generator. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Kandil7/prprompts-flutter-generator/master/.claude/commands/prprompts/phase-2.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kandil7/prprompts-flutter-generatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kandil7/prprompts-flutter-generator/phase-2)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kandil7/prprompts-flutter-generator/phase-2"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kandil7/prprompts-flutter-generator/phase-2.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01776 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00888 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00355 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
Generate Phase 2 scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Strips warnings and disclaimerslowAnti-refusal
Omitting safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.
- `dartdoc` must build without warnings Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 204 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate Phase 2: Quality & Security (v2.0)
Overview
Generate the 12 quality and security PRPROMPTS files following v2.0 strict PRP pattern.
Input
Read: docs/PRD.md - Extract YAML frontmatter for customization.
V2.0 SPECIFICATION
PRP Pattern (MANDATORY)
Every file MUST follow this exact 6-section structure:
## FEATURE
What this guide helps you accomplish
## EXAMPLES
Real code with actual file paths
## CONSTRAINTS
✅ DO / ❌ DON'T rules
## VALIDATION GATES
Manual checklist + automated CI checks
## BEST PRACTICES
Junior-friendly "Why?" explanations
## REFERENCES
Official docs, compliance guides, ADRs
Quality Requirements
- ✅ Length: 500-600 words per file
- ✅ No Placeholders: All content actionable
- ✅ Real Examples: Actual code, commands, workflows
- ✅ Junior-Friendly: Explain rationale
- ✅ Security-Critical: Double-check HIPAA/PCI-DSS/GDPR patterns
Output
IMPORTANT: All files MUST go inside the PRPROMPTS/ folder.
Files to Generate (12 files, numbered 11-22)
-
11-git_branching_strategy.md (500-600 words)
- Feature branches, PR reviews, Git Flow
- Branch naming:
feature/,fix/,hotfix/ - 2 approvals required
-
12-progress_tracking_workflow.md (500-600 words)
- Jira/Linear/GitHub Projects
- Sprint planning, story points
- All PRs must reference issues
-
13-multi_team_coordination.md (500-600 words)
- API contracts, shared libraries
- Downstream approval for breaking changes
- Adapt to team size from PRD
-
14-security_audit_checklist.md (500-600 words)
- No secrets in code, HTTPS only
git secrets --scan- OWASP Mobile Top 10
-
15-release_management.md (500-600 words)
- App Store submission, versioning
- TestFlight/Firebase beta
- QA signoff required
-
16-security_and_compliance.md (500-600 words) ⭐ CRITICAL - PRD-CUSTOMIZED
- MUST adapt based on PRD's
compliancefield - HIPAA: PHI encryption (AES-256-GCM), audit logging
final encrypted = await _encryptor.encrypt( patientData, key: await _secureStorage.getEncryptionKey()); await _db.insert('patients', {'data': encrypted}); - PCI-DSS: Payment tokenization (Stripe/PayPal), NEVER store full cards
final last4 = cardNumber.substring(cardNumber.length - 4); await _db.insert('cards', {'last4': last4, 'token': stripeToken}); - GDPR: Consent management, right to erasure
- JWT: Verification only (NO signing in Flutter)
Future<bool> verifyToken(String token) async { final jwt = JWT.verify(token, RSAPublicKey(publicKey), audience: Audience(['my-app']), issuer: 'api.example.com'); return jwt.payload['exp'] > DateTime.now().millisecondsSinceEpoch / 1000; }
- MUST adapt based on PRD's
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 204 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A d051c666b1cf
Generate Phase 2 is a command published in the GitHub repository Kandil7/prprompts-flutter-generator (11 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,776 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (strips warnings and disclaimers). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
speckit.tdd.plan
Derive the feature's test list by delegating to zfa tdd plan (deterministic engine); falls back to LLM-guided derivation only when zfa is unavailable.
speckit.tdd.run
Drive the red-green-refactor loop by delegating to zfa tdd run (deterministic engine); the LLM handles only honest stops — fixing genuine reds and remediation — never re-driving what zfa drives.
speckit.tdd.setup
Detect the test stack and write .specify/memory/tdd-profile.md; zuraffa-wired projects record zfa commands as the engine.
speckit.tdd.verify
Audit TDD discipline by delegating to zfa tdd verify (mutation testing, evidence integrity); the LLM interprets the verdict and drives remediation.
speckit.spec-stats.runs
On-demand execution — reads verified suite command from .specify/memory/tdd-profile.md, runs it for selected specs (--all, spec id/slug, or default active feature), captures pass/fail + duration + tail, appends run record to .specify/stats/runs.json, refreshes dashboard health column.
speckit.spec-stats.not-green
On-demand view of specs whose latest test evidence is red or unknown, with the exact evidence line quoted from tdd/cycle-log.md and the command that would produce evidence.