agentmods.dev

review-security

review-security is a command for Claude Code from karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit. It costs 0 tokens per session (243 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that reviews changed project files for Salesforce security problems. Salesforce is a business software platform whose code commonly includes database queries, permissions, records, and external connections.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect changed files, report each issue with severity and location, suggest fixes, and produce a summary of the review.
Why use it?
It helps identify unsafe queries, missing permissions, exposed secrets, overly broad access, and other common Salesforce risks before code is shipped.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

not rated 2repo 6mo ago A scan 0 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to inspect changed files, report each issue with severity and location, suggest fixes, and produce a summary of the review.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/review-security
View source ↗ karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-security

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/review-security/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/review-security)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/review-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/review-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-security

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/review-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit/review-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 243 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00243
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00097
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00049
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00024

Measured 2mo ago against content hash d446f3f2fc6d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

examples/existing-project-after/.claude/commands/review-security.md · 26 lines

What it actually says

/review-security

Review the changed files in this project for Salesforce security issues.

What to check

  1. SOQL injection — dynamic SOQL without escapeSingleQuotes or bind variables
  2. CRUD/FLS — all DML and queries enforce appropriate object and field permissions
  3. Sharing — all Apex classes use with sharing (or have documented exceptions)
  4. Secrets — no tokens, credentials, session IDs, JWTs, or private keys in code or metadata
  5. Named Credentials — all external callouts use Named Credentials
  6. Guest user — no sensitive data accessible without authentication
  7. Hardcoded IDs — no hardcoded org IDs, record IDs, or user IDs
  8. Permissions — no over-privileged Permission Set assignments

Output format

For each file reviewed:

  • List any security issues found (severity: Critical / High / Medium / Low)
  • Provide the specific line or code that is the concern
  • Suggest the fix

End with a summary table: File | Issues Found | Severity.

If no issues found, state clearly: "No security issues found."

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d446f3f2fc6d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-security is a command published in the GitHub repository karkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 243 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Code reviewSecurity
Related

review-security compared with commands from other repositories

review-security next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
review-securitykarkranikhil/sf-ai-toolkitCommand26mo agoMITA0Claude Code
diff-reviewcoco-research/cocoCommand785yesterdayApache-2.0A11Claude Code
review-branchdamusix/atomic-claudeCommand1155d agoMITA35Claude Code
refactorRchGrav/claudeboxCommand1.2k1mo agoMITA9Claude Code
spec-trace-requirementsrjmurillo/ai-agentsCommand49yesterdayMITA0GitHub Copilot
merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agentsCommand49yesterdayMITA0GitHub Copilot
initazrtydxb/procoderCommand21111d agoApache-2.0A16Claude Code