Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kastalien-Research/thoughtboxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kastalien-research/thoughtbox/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kastalien-research/thoughtbox/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kastalien-research/thoughtbox/research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kastalien-research/thoughtbox/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kastalien-research/thoughtbox/research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00186 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
hdd:research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/hdd:research
Build context and hypotheses for a new ADR initiative.
Usage
/hdd:research "<task-goal>"
Delegation
- Primary module:
./modules/research-brief.md - Handoff schema:
../_contracts/delegation-handoff-schema.md
Inputs
task_goalpaths_to_inspect(accepted ADRs, rejected ADRs, staging ADRs, relevant specs)acceptance_checks
Steps
- Delegate research to the module using path-scoped inputs.
- Capture hypotheses, unknowns, and open risks.
- Ask for user approval before moving to ADR staging.
Output
- Research summary with SOFT hypotheses and blockers.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A d40f01c742ab
hdd:research is a command published in the GitHub repository Kastalien-Research/thoughtbox (66 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 186 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
data-mesh-contract
Create federated data product contracts for mesh architectures with SLAs, governance, and interoperability guarantees (project).
release-manager
Automated release coordination and deployment with ruv-swarm orchestration for seamless version management, testing, and deployment across multiple packages.
atrs
Generate Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) record for AI/algorithmic tools.
fr-rgpd
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a French CNIL Compliance Assessment — the French-specific GDPR layer applied by the CNIL (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés). Run this after /arckit-eu:eu-rgpd to add French obligations that go beyond the EU GDPR baseline.
flow-nexus-neural
Train and deploy neural networks in distributed sandboxes.
performance-bottlenecks
Identify and resolve performance bottlenecks in your development workflow.