CCManager is a command-line application for managing multiple sessions of AI coding assistants across Git worktrees and projects. It is for developers working with tools such as Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, Cursor Agent, Copilot CLI, Cline CLI, OpenCode, and Kimi CLI, and the catalogue entries provide commands and instructions for its workflows.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kbwo/ccmanager. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kbwo/ccmanager/main/.claude/commands/kiro/spec-tasks.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kbwo/ccmanagerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kbwo/ccmanager/spec-tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kbwo/ccmanager/spec-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kbwo/ccmanager/spec-tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kbwo/ccmanager/spec-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kbwo/ccmanager/spec-tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.01747 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00699 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
spec-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- spec-tasks — 100% identical, 1 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implementation Tasks
Generate detailed implementation tasks for feature: $1
Task: Generate Implementation Tasks
Prerequisites & Context Loading
- If invoked with
-yflag ($2 == "-y"): Auto-approve requirements and design inspec.json - Otherwise: Stop if requirements/design missing or unapproved with message:
"Run
/kiro:spec-requirementsand/kiro:spec-designfirst, or use-yflag to auto-approve" - If tasks.md exists: Prompt [o]verwrite/[m]erge/[c]ancel
Context Loading (Full Paths):
.kiro/specs/$1/requirements.md- Feature requirements (EARS format).kiro/specs/$1/design.md- Technical design document.kiro/steering/- Project-wide guidelines and constraints:- Core files (always load):
- @.kiro/steering/product.md - Business context, product vision, user needs
- @.kiro/steering/tech.md - Technology stack, frameworks, libraries
- @.kiro/steering/structure.md - File organization, naming conventions, code patterns
- Custom steering files (load all EXCEPT "Manual" mode in
AGENTS.md):- Any additional
*.mdfiles in.kiro/steering/directory - Examples:
api.md,testing.md,security.md, etc.
- Any additional
- (Task planning benefits from comprehensive context)
- Core files (always load):
.kiro/specs/$1/tasks.md- Existing tasks (only if merge mode)
CRITICAL Task Numbering Rules (MUST FOLLOW)
⚠️ MANDATORY: Sequential major task numbering & hierarchy limits
- Major tasks: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... (MUST increment sequentially)
- Sub-tasks: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2... (reset per major task)
- Maximum 2 levels of hierarchy (no 1.1.1 or deeper)
- Format exactly as:
- [ ] 1. Major task description
- [ ] 1.1 Sub-task description
- Detail item 1
- Detail item 2
- _Requirements: X.X, Y.Y_
- [ ] 1.2 Sub-task description
- Detail items...
- _Requirements: X.X_
- [ ] 2. Next major task (NOT 1 again!)
- [ ] 2.1 Sub-task...
Task Generation Rules
- Natural language descriptions: Focus on capabilities and outcomes, not code structure
- Describe what functionality to achieve, not file locations or code organization
- Specify business logic and behavior, not method signatures or type definitions
- Reference features and capabilities, not class names or API contracts
- Use domain language, not programming constructs
- Avoid: File paths, function/method names, type signatures, class/interface names, specific data structures
- Include: User-facing functionality, business rules, system behaviors, data relationships
- Implementation details (files, methods, types) come from design.md
- Task integration & progression:
- Each task must build on previous outputs (no orphaned code)
- End with integration tasks to wire everything together
- No hanging features - every component must connect to the system
- Incremental complexity - no big jumps between tasks
- Validate core functionality early in the sequence
- Flexible task sizing:
- Major tasks: As many sub-tasks as logically needed
- Sub-tasks: 1-3 hours each, 3-10 details per sub
- Group by cohesion, not arbitrary numbers
- Balance between too granular and too broad
- Requirements mapping: End details with
_Requirements: X.X, Y.Y_or_Requirements: [description]_ - Code-only focus: Include ONLY coding/testing tasks, exclude deployment/docs/user testing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 177 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 59215aa9b6d7
spec-tasks is a command published in the GitHub repository kbwo/ccmanager (1,264 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 1,747 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
maestro-odyssey
Long-running iterative cycle — one entry, seven modes (debug|improve|planex|review|security|defensive|ui). Shared archaeology/audit → fix → verify → generalize → discover → persist skeleton with mode-specific dimensions. User-invoked campaign entry; single-step fixes route via /maestro-next.
dispatch
Every task description uses structured format for clarity.
maestro-companion
Quick execution for small tasks — minimal run lifecycle (start + done) with evidence recording. Full LLM capability, scoped to mechanically clear tasks.
maestro-fork
Create or sync session worktree for parallel dev.
maestro-guard
Manage editing boundary restrictions.
converge
Bash: python /scripts/aco.py --session {rundir}/work/team report.