Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/keugenek/sharkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/keugenek/shark/shark-autotune)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/keugenek/shark/shark-autotune"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/keugenek/shark/shark-autotune/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/keugenek/shark/shark-autotune"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/keugenek/shark/shark-autotune.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00479 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
shark-autotune scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Shark Autotune
Analyse recorded shark timing data and recommend optimal settings.
Instructions
-
Read
$SKILL_DIR/state/timings.jsonl— each line is a JSON object:{"ts": 1710000000, "loop": 1, "elapsed_s": 12.3, "timeout_s": 25, "result": "ok|timeout|done", "task_hash": "abc123"} -
If the file doesn't exist or is empty, report "No timing data yet. Run tasks with /shark first to collect data."
-
Compute and report:
- Total runs and total loops recorded
- Median turn time (p50) and p95 turn time
- Timeout rate — % of turns that hit the timeout
- Loops to completion — median and max loops needed
- Wasted time — sum of (timeout - elapsed) for turns that finished early (idle headroom)
- Optimal timeout — p95 turn time + 3s buffer (rounded up to nearest 5s)
- Optimal max_loops — p95 loops-to-completion + 2
-
Show recommendations:
Current: SHARK_LOOP_TIMEOUT=25 SHARK_MAX_LOOPS=50 Recommended: SHARK_LOOP_TIMEOUT=N SHARK_MAX_LOOPS=M Rationale: - p95 turn time is Xs, so timeout of Ns covers 95% of turns with buffer - p95 completion is N loops, so max_loops of M gives safe margin - Timeout rate is X% — [too high: lower timeout or split tasks | healthy: <15%] - Wasted headroom: Xs total — [high: timeout too generous | low: well-tuned] -
If timeout rate > 30%, also suggest: "Consider breaking tasks into smaller steps — high timeout rate means turns are consistently too ambitious."
-
If median turn time < 5s, suggest: "Most turns complete very fast. Consider lowering timeout to reclaim resources faster on stuck turns."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 42 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A b9891c96bd47
shark-autotune is a command published in the GitHub repository keugenek/shark (11 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 479 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
fix
Universal debugging and fix application with semantic code analysis.
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.
gh-issue-use-cypress
Like /gh-issue-use-browser, but pinned to the Cypress MCP — use when your project runs the Cypress MCP for browser automation. Example — /gh-issue-use-cypress "Composer > Save" saving toasts failure but the record persists.