Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/kevinzai/commander/ccc-feature-startgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KevinZai/commanderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kevinzai/commander/ccc-feature-start)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kevinzai/commander/ccc-feature-start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kevinzai/commander/ccc-feature-start.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00521 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00260 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
ccc-feature-start scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Feature Start — Structured Feature Kickoff
Starting feature: {{input}}
Phase 1: Research & Context
- Check existing work: Search codebase for related code, previous PRs, and open issues
- Check lessons: Read
tasks/lessons.mdfor relevant past learnings - Check dependencies: Identify what this feature touches (files, modules, APIs)
- Architecture fit: Where does this feature belong in the codebase?
Phase 2: Branch & Setup
- Pull latest from main:
git pull origin main - Create feature branch:
git checkout -b feature/{{input-slug}} - Verify baseline: run tests to confirm everything passes before changes
Phase 3: Task Breakdown
Create tasks/todo.md with a structured plan:
# Feature: {{input}}
## Tasks
- [ ] Write spec (requirements, acceptance criteria, edge cases)
- [ ] Design API/interface (if applicable)
- [ ] Write failing tests (TDD red phase)
- [ ] Implement core logic (TDD green phase)
- [ ] Refactor and clean up
- [ ] Integration tests
- [ ] Documentation updates
- [ ] Code review preparation
- [ ] Final verification
Phase 4: TDD Kickoff
- Define what "done" looks like (acceptance criteria)
- Define what "broken" looks like (edge cases, error scenarios)
- Write the FIRST failing test
- Create WIP commit:
git commit -m "feat: start {{input}} — failing tests"
Phase 5: Architecture Notes
Document key decisions in the commit or task file:
- Pattern chosen: [why this approach]
- Files to modify: [list]
- Files to create: [list]
- Dependencies: [new packages needed?]
- Risks: [what could go wrong]
Output
FEATURE START: {{input}}
Branch: feature/{{input-slug}}
Baseline tests: [PASS/FAIL]
Tasks created: [count]
First test: [written/pending]
Ready for TDD: [YES/NO]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 70 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 7f3e730d4b62
ccc-feature-start is a command published in the GitHub repository KevinZai/commander (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 521 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
loop
Autonomous execution loop. Runs the TDD cycle repeatedly until all tasks in an epic are complete, with circuit breaker protection and PR workflow.
execute
Execute the next available tracked task with TDD, pre-commit validation, PR creation, AI code review, and issue tracker bridge sync.
my_tdd
Start Test-Driven Development workflow. Write failing tests first, then implement minimal code, then refactor.
crew-rollback
Undo the last task's file changes using git. Shows affected files and requires confirmation before reverting.
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.