Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/kevinzai/commander/ccc-harness-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KevinZai/commanderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kevinzai/commander/ccc-harness-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kevinzai/commander/ccc-harness-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kevinzai/commander/ccc-harness-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00546 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00273 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
ccc-harness-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to harness-audit — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Harness Audit Command
Run a deterministic repository harness audit and return a prioritized scorecard.
Usage
/harness-audit [scope] [--format text|json]
scope(optional):repo(default),hooks,skills,commands,agents--format: output style (textdefault,jsonfor automation)
Deterministic Engine
Always run:
node scripts/harness-audit.js <scope> --format <text|json>
This script is the source of truth for scoring and checks. Do not invent additional dimensions or ad-hoc points.
Rubric version: 2026-03-16.
The script computes 7 fixed categories (0-10 normalized each):
- Tool Coverage
- Context Efficiency
- Quality Gates
- Memory Persistence
- Eval Coverage
- Security Guardrails
- Cost Efficiency
Scores are derived from explicit file/rule checks and are reproducible for the same commit.
Output Contract
Return:
overall_scoreout ofmax_score(70 forrepo; smaller for scoped audits)- Category scores and concrete findings
- Failed checks with exact file paths
- Top 3 actions from the deterministic output (
top_actions) - Suggested ECC skills to apply next
Checklist
- Use script output directly; do not rescore manually.
- If
--format jsonis requested, return the script JSON unchanged. - If text is requested, summarize failing checks and top actions.
- Include exact file paths from
checks[]andtop_actions[].
Example Result
Harness Audit (repo): 66/70
- Tool Coverage: 10/10 (10/10 pts)
- Context Efficiency: 9/10 (9/10 pts)
- Quality Gates: 10/10 (10/10 pts)
Top 3 Actions:
1) [Security Guardrails] Add prompt/tool preflight security guards in hooks/hooks.json. (hooks/hooks.json)
2) [Tool Coverage] Sync commands/harness-audit.md and .opencode/commands/harness-audit.md. (.opencode/commands/harness-audit.md)
3) [Eval Coverage] Increase automated test coverage across scripts/hooks/lib. (tests/)
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS:
repo|hooks|skills|commands|agents(optional scope)--format text|json(optional output format)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 76 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 74c0d55a4300
ccc-harness-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository KevinZai/commander (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 546 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to harness-audit, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
debug
Systematic debugging with hypotheses and evidence gathering.
review
Run a Codex code review of your working tree or a branch (read-only).
adv-codex
Send a prompt to Codex CLI and return the response.
execute
Execute the next available tracked task with TDD, pre-commit validation, PR creation, AI code review, and issue tracker bridge sync.
planning-triage
Quick-score an enhancement, bug, or feedback item using the impact-first triage framework. Creates an issue if approved.
add-hook
Add a new hook to .claude/settings.json. Quick operation, no full interview needed. Trigger phrases: "add hook", "auto-format on save", "run tests after edit", "lint on write", "run [command] after [tool]".