Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to khalilbenaz/MDAN. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/khalilbenaz/MDAN/main/.claude/commands/mdan-editorial-review-structure.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/khalilbenaz/MDANWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/khalilbenaz/mdan/mdan-editorial-review-structure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/khalilbenaz/mdan/mdan-editorial-review-structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/khalilbenaz/mdan/mdan-editorial-review-structure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/khalilbenaz/mdan/mdan-editorial-review-structure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/khalilbenaz/mdan/mdan-editorial-review-structure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00082 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00041 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00016 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00008 |
Grade A, and why
editorial-review-structure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to editorial-review-structure — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
editorial-review-structure
Read the entire task file at: {project-root}/_mdan/core/tasks/editorial-review-structure.xml
Follow all instructions in the task file exactly as written.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 11 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 19ae8b29d7e7
editorial-review-structure is a command published in the GitHub repository khalilbenaz/MDAN (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 82 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to editorial-review-structure, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
compact-prep
Ask the agent to prepare for conversation compaction by updating any relevant state and providing guidance for the compaction agent and to kick off the session there after.
learn-story-flow
Learn story-flow concepts with interactive guidance for junior developers.
analyze
Analyze Claude Code transcripts to surface subagent behavior and improvement opportunities.
linkedin-editor
Run the 8-step LinkedIn editor on any source (an article, a case study, a draft, rough notes) and deliver ready-to-publish, founder-voice LinkedIn posts optimized for reach and leads, not likes.
pm-competitive
Competitive teardown — for a given competitor or for the whole landscape around a JTBD. Spawns market-analyst. Outputs structured brief with positioning gaps.
pseo-gbp-audit
Use when: kullanıcı "GBP audit", "Google Business Profile kontrol", "placeid eksik mi", "business listing kontrol", "harita listing audit", "google haritalar profili", "GMB audit", "local listing gap" der ya da /pseo-gbp-audit çağırırsa. Also use when: aktif projenin project.config.profiles array'inde "local-service"…