Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KimYx0207/Meta_KimWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-theory)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-theory"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-theory/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-theory"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kimyx0207/meta_kim/meta-theory.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01449 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00724 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00290 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
meta-theory scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Use the machine-governed Meta_Kim entry for this request:
$ARGUMENTS
Default product runtime path:
When this command is installed globally, run the installed Meta_Kim package root directly:
node "__META_KIM_PACKAGE_ROOT__/scripts/run-meta-theory-governed-execution.mjs" --runtime claude_code --emit-conversation-notice "$ARGUMENTS"
If this command file has not been rendered by global sync and the placeholder is still present, fall back only when the current project is the Meta_Kim source checkout or provides the package script:
npm run meta:theory:run:notice -- --runtime claude_code "$ARGUMENTS"
Then reopen the report with:
node "__META_KIM_PACKAGE_ROOT__/scripts/run-meta-theory-governed-execution.mjs" --read latest
This command is not a prose-only reminder. For explicit /meta-theory requests,
project/repo understanding, architecture analysis, commercialization strategy,
market or competitor reasoning, governance review, release work, runtime work,
or any non-trivial durable task, run the machine entry above or state the exact
blocking reason.
Minimum route:
- Classify the request with the Meta_Kim entry rules.
- Run Fetch before Thinking. Project understanding must inspect local project evidence such as README, AGENTS, package scripts, canonical/config contracts, capability index, MCP/runtime configs, and Graphify navigation when present.
- If the answer depends on current market, competitor, platform, provider, pricing, dependency, version, or official documentation facts, prove an available retrieval path or return blocked to Fetch.
- Use the run artifact and report as the evidence surface. Do not replace the machine route with a short manual summary.
Two host-native phases are mandatory:
- Phase 1 — route and handoff: run the governed Node command only to
produce route compatibility and a handoff state.
ready_for_host_handoffmeans Claude Code must perform the next native action;awaiting_native_choicemeans it must callAskUserQuestion;blockedmeans it must stop. The runner never authorizes task execution. - Phase 2 — current-host action: after any required
AskUserQuestionanswer, use the active Claude Code host's realAgent/ Task, tools, and permission surface. Persistent acceptance records are advisory compatibility evidence only. No callback, environment value, or JSON can complete the native choice or authorize this task.
Claude Code execution rule:
HOST-NATIVE FAN-OUT PREFERRED. The main thread is the dispatcher, never
the execution worker. The governed runner produces route evidence,
workerTaskPackets, and hostInvocationRequestPacket; it does not by itself
prove live Claude Code Agent / Task execution. Use Claude Code's native
Agent/Task tool directly to fan out independent worker lanes — the runner
only records evidence, discovers capabilities, and suggests lanes; it does
not enforce dispatch.
- This
/meta-theoryinvocation is explicit user authorization to use Claude Code Agent/Task delegation and parallel worker lanes when Thinking proves the lanes are independent and safe. - Use the authoritative stage DAG plus native Agent/Task as the sufficient
fan-out route.
agent-teams-playbookis optional: select it only when it improves orchestration, recordnot_requiredfor fewer than two ready lanes, and recordoptional_adapter_not_selectedwhen native fan-out is sufficient. Resolve it from the first available skill root (~/.claude/skills/agent-teams-playbook/SKILL.md,.claude/skills/agent-teams-playbook/SKILL.md,.agents/skills/agent-teams-playbook/SKILL.md, or a configured dependency root). Treat it as a selected fan-out adapter unless a live Skill/Agent Team/Task call is attached. - Then call the active Claude Code host's real
Agent/ Task surface for each selected execution worker lane. Every Agent/Task prompt must cite the correspondingworkerTaskPackets[].taskPacketId, selected owner/role, output schema, write scope, collision boundary, verification owner, and expected evidence shape. - Record the returned Agent/Task tool-call id, completion status, and worker-task-to-agent mapping as trusted host invocation evidence. If no callable Agent/Task surface is available, record the checked tool/capability names and blocked reason; do not silently continue as main-thread execution.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 134 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A ed7bf99949cb
meta-theory is a command published in the GitHub repository KimYx0207/Meta_Kim (273 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,449 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-apply
Implement SDD tasks — writes code following specs and design.
sdd-explore
Explore and investigate an idea or feature — reads codebase and compares approaches.
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
gentle-sdd-ff
Fast-forward all SDD planning phases — proposal through tasks.
constitution
A command for creating or updating a project's constitution, a document that records its governing principles and working rules, in Simplified Chinese.
cross-research
Two-phase multi-model research. Phase A fans codex+gemini in parallel (benchmarks + citations angles); Phase B synthesises via fresh Claude session. Usage: /cross-research [--with | list | compare].