Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kitokoh/leopardo-hrWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kitokoh/leopardo-hr/speckit.specify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kitokoh/leopardo-hr/speckit.specify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kitokoh/leopardo-hr/speckit.specify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kitokoh/leopardo-hr/speckit.specify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kitokoh/leopardo-hr/speckit.specify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00362 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00145 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.specify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
{CORE_TEMPLATE}
🔴 Leopardo Payroll Compliance Gate (auto-injected by preset leopardo-payroll)
After generating the spec above, verify and append the following section before saving:
Does this spec touch api/app/Modules/Payroll/?
If YES — append to the spec:
## Conformité Paie (obligatoire)
- **Pays ciblé** : [CODE ISO]
- **Référence** : docs/payroll/{PAYS}_COMPLIANCE.md
- **Référence légale** : [CGI art. XX / Code du travail art. YY]
### Golden tests requis (calculés à la main)
1. SMIG → net exact avec calcul commenté
2. Cadre moyen → IRG/IRPP + cotisations + net
3. Plafond cotisation → cotisation sur cap, pas sur brut
### Tenant isolation requis
- Tout endpoint : test `assert 404 cross-tenant`
- Toutes les requêtes Eloquent : `->where('company_id', ...)`
### CI
- PHPStan strict `[OK] No errors`
- Coverage Payroll ≥ 80 %
- CHANGELOG.md mis à jour
If NO — no additional section needed.
Anti-duplicate check
Before finalizing this spec, run:
gh issue list --state open --label "payroll" --json number,title,assignees | head -20
If a similar spec/issue already exists and is assigned → stop and contribute to that issue instead.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A d47a61f41386
speckit.specify is a command published in the GitHub repository kitokoh/leopardo-hr (14 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 362 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-system-design
Review a system design someone else provided - screenshot, drawio, Mermaid, slides, doc, or IaC - by extracting it into a confirmed fact sheet, then scoring it on the nine axes.
sdlc
Route a task to the next synced SDLC workflow based on current artifacts and repo state.
brainstorm-feature
SDLC intake that turns a rough idea into an approved BRD-lite brief (Why lane) or delivery contract (Direction lane) at docs/brd/brd-[slug].md, sized by SNC tier.
codebase-review
Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.
plan-feature
Plan a feature from BRD-lite brief or clear intent into PRD (What), decisions, implementation plan, and task slices.
discover-product
Discover and frame product opportunities using verified customer and market evidence, strategic authority, and explicit non-goals.