Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/kog123/visual-intelligence-mcp/ffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KOG123/visual-intelligence-mcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01730 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00865 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00346 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
OPSX: Fast Forward scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to OPSX: Propose — 66 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fast-forward through artifact creation - generate everything needed to start implementation.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: The argument after /opsx:ff is the change name (kebab-case), OR a description of what the user wants to build.
Steps
-
If no input provided, ask what they want to build
Ask the user (open-ended, no preset options):
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
Create the change directory
openspec new change "<name>"This creates a scaffolded change in the planning home resolved by the CLI.
-
Get the artifact build order
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to get:
applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g.,["tasks"])artifacts: list of all artifacts, each with itsstatusand itsrequiresedges (the artifact IDs it directly depends on)planningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andactionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
Create every artifact in the required set
Use a todo list to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. For each artifact that is
ready(dependencies satisfied):- Get instructions:
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - The instructions JSON includes:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact typeskipped/warning: present when the change declares skip_specs and this artifact must NOT be created - stop and pick another artifactresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Read any completed dependency files for context - always re-read them from disk, even if you saw them earlier in the conversation (the user may have edited them)
- If the
instructionfield delegates creation to a specific skill or command, invoke it to produce the artifact instead of writing the file yourself, then verify the artifact file exists atresolvedOutputPath - Otherwise create the artifact file using
templateas the structure and write it toresolvedOutputPath. IfresolvedOutputPathis a glob, followinstructionto choose the concrete file path - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file - Show brief progress: "✓ Created "
b. Continue until every artifact in the required set exists (not just
apply.requires)- After creating each artifact, re-run
openspec status --change "<name>" --json - The required set is
applyRequiresplus every artifact reachable from those by following therequiresedges instatus --json- walk them transitively (spec-driven closes over proposal, specs, design, tasks). Leave artifacts outside that set alone statusis file-existence only, so anapplyRequiresartifact readingdonedoes NOT mean its dependencies exist - writingtasks.mdearly markstasksdone whilespecswas never written. Use each artifact'srequiresedges, not itsstatus, to build the required set: adoneartifact still lists what it depends on- An artifact already reading
status: "skipped"is satisfied: the change declaresskip_specsin.openspec.yaml, so its files must NOT exist. Never try to create one - Create every artifact in the required set that is missing, then re-check - creating one can unblock others
- Skip one only when
statusalready reports itskipped, or when its owninstructionsays it is conditional: runopenspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --jsonand skip only if itsinstructionfield marks it optional (e.g. "create only if..."). Spec-driven'sdesign.mdqualifies;specsqualifies only via theskippedstatus above, never by your own judgment. Tell the user, and do not reconsider it - Dependencies are enablers, not gates: if a required artifact is still
blockedonly because you skipped a conditional dependency, write it anyway - Stop when every artifact in the required set is
done,skipped, or was deliberately skipped
- Get instructions:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 110 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A ab866398afee
OPSX: Fast Forward is a command published in the GitHub repository KOG123/visual-intelligence-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,730 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to OPSX: Propose, differing in 66 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
OPSX: Continue
Continue working on a change - create the next artifact (Experimental).
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
OPSX: Update
Update a change - revise existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent (Experimental).