Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/koolamusic/claudefilesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01899 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00949 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00380 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00190 |
Grade A, and why
issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Draft a GitHub issue from internal sprint artifacts. The shape decides the template; the domain decides the evidence layer. Default behavior saves a draft to disk; pushing is explicit.
Parse the input
$ARGUMENTS must include:
- Shape (positional, required):
research|spec|wave --domain <name>(required):backend|library|frontend|integration|infra--wave <roman>(required forwaveshape): the wave identifier, e.g.--wave II--push(optional): actually create the GitHub issue after drafting--sprint <slug>(optional): override the active sprint
If shape or domain is missing, use AskUserQuestion to collect them (bundle into one question). Do not guess.
Steps
-
Locate the sprint.
- If
--sprint <slug>provided, use it. - Otherwise
slug=$(cat .jira/CURRENT). If empty or missing, stop — there is no active sprint to draw from. Tell the user to run/jira:researchor pass--sprint.
- If
-
Verify source docs by shape:
research— requires.jira/sprints/<slug>/RESEARCH.mdspec— requires at least one.jira/sprints/<slug>/*-PLAN.mdand.jira/sprints/<slug>/CONTEXT.mdwave— requires the specific.jira/sprints/<slug>/<NN>-PLAN.mdmatching--wave <roman>. Map Roman to the NN prefix by reading thewave:field in each PLAN's frontmatter. If ambiguous (two plans in the same wave), list them viaAskUserQuestionand ask which one.
If a required source is missing, stop and tell the user what to do (
/jira:research→/jira:plan→ then/jira:issue). -
Read the guide and template.
- Always read
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/issue/GUIDE.mdfirst — it defines the principles and the domain matrix. - Read
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/author-conventions.mdtoo — the public/internal boundary for the body: no internal decision IDs,.jira/paths, or jargon; locked decisions become constraints or acceptance criteria. - Then read
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/issue/<shape>.md.
- Always read
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 139 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A b1dff4b387a2
issue is a command published in the GitHub repository koolamusic/claudefiles (132 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,899 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
project-recap
Generate a visual project recap for context switching.
speckit.taskstoissues
Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts.
ado-pull
Pull latest changes from Azure DevOps (like git pull). Supports increment, project, or full living docs sync.
issue-amend
Re-snapshot the active issue's scope from the spec, clear verified and reviewed receipts, and record the change as a permanent amendment.
dispatch-worker
Run one in-session-agent Worker tick (RFC-0041 §4.3.1).