Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/retrogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/koolamusic/claudefilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/retro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/retro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/koolamusic/claudefiles/retro.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00868 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
retro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Capture lessons from completed work. Two modes:
- Per-sprint (default, or
--sprint <slug>) — one RETRO.md inside the sprint dir - Rollup (
--since <date>) — synthesize across all sprints since a date into.jira/retros/<date>.md
Per-sprint mode
-
Resolve the sprint slug:
--sprint <slug>orcat .jira/CURRENT. Stop if missing. -
Read BRIEF.md, CONTEXT.md, all
*-PLAN.mdfiles, EXECUTION.md, VERIFICATION.md, and REVIEW.md (if any exist). -
Use
AskUserQuestionto elicit the human's view. Five tight questions, single message:- Outcome: shipped, partial, abandoned, other?
- What worked best?
- What slowed you down?
- Biggest surprise?
- Anything to change about the workflow itself?
Treat the answers as raw input — do not paraphrase them.
-
Write RETRO.md at
.jira/sprints/<slug>/RETRO.mdusing the template at${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/sprint/RETRO.md. Combine:- Workflow signal from disk (commits made, deviations from EXECUTION.md, Nyquist gaps, review findings)
- Human signal from AskUserQuestion (verbatim, attributed)
-
Surface follow-ups. If the user named concrete actions, list them as a checklist at the bottom. Don't create new sprints — that's the user's call.
-
Update STATE.md. Append any "Lessons for the workflow itself" to the
## Notessection (these accumulate across sprints). -
Commit:
git add .jira/sprints/<slug>/RETRO.md .jira/STATE.md git commit -m "retro(<slug>): <one-line outcome>"
Rollup mode (--since YYYY-MM-DD)
-
Find sprints with directory dates ≥
<since>:ls .jira/sprints/ | awk -F- '{print $1"-"$2"-"$3" "$0}' | sort | awk -v d="<since>" '$1>=d {print $2}'. -
Read each sprint's BRIEF, PLAN, EXECUTION, RETRO (if RETRO exists; otherwise skip per-sprint retro and rely on plan/execution signal).
-
Use
AskUserQuestionwith three rollup questions:- Across these sprints, what pattern keeps coming up — good or bad?
- Which sprint had the biggest learning?
- One change you'd commit to for the next batch?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 75 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A b74ae8a0f16d
retro is a command published in the GitHub repository koolamusic/claudefiles (132 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 868 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.