Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kopi-vm/kopi. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kopi-vm/kopi/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kopi-vm/kopiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kopi-vm/kopi/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kopi-vm/kopi/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kopi-vm/kopi/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kopi-vm/kopi/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kopi-vm/kopi/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00253 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00101 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review
Review the contents of a specified directory and provide a comprehensive analysis of the code structure, patterns, and potential improvements.
Usage
Specify a directory path to review. If no path is provided, reviews the current directory.
Examples:
/review src/- Review the src directory/review src/commands/- Review the commands module/review- Review the current directory
Steps to execute:
- List all files in the specified directory recursively
- Analyze the code structure and organization
- Identify patterns and architectural decisions
- Check for code quality issues:
- Unused code or dependencies
- Inconsistent naming conventions
- Missing error handling
- Potential performance issues
- File size and complexity (consider splitting large files)
- Module organization and separation of concerns
- Suggest improvements based on the project's coding standards (CLAUDE.md)
- Highlight any security concerns or best practice violations
- Provide a summary with actionable recommendations
The review follows the principles outlined in CLAUDE.md:
- Memory safety over micro-optimization
- Code clarity and maintainability
- Clean code maintenance (removing unused elements)
- Proper error handling patterns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 34 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9337aa78eb55
review is a command published in the GitHub repository kopi-vm/kopi (29 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 253 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-11.
review compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewkopi-vm/kopi | Command | 29 | 1y ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| diff-reviewcoco-research/coco | Command | 631 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 11 | Claude Code |
| review-branchdamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 117 | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| initazrtydxb/procoder | Command | 212 | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| refactorRchGrav/claudebox | Command | 1.2k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| spec-trace-requirementsrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | today | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |
| merge-conflict-analysisrjmurillo/ai-agents | Command | 49 | today | MIT | A | 0 | GitHub Copilot |