Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kripu77/software-factoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kripu77/software-factory/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kripu77/software-factory/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kripu77/software-factory/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kripu77/software-factory/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kripu77/software-factory/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00202 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read lanes/review.md and AGENTS.md. Run /code-review on the given PR only. Leave GitHub review comments. Do not implement. Do not merge.
At start, factory.sh mem read for this PR. Write started only if none in progress: factory.sh mem write --lane review --status started --harness <claude|cursor|codex|grok> --pr . At the end, factory.sh mem write --lane review --status done|blocked|failed --harness <claude|cursor|codex|grok> --pr --summary "" --evidence --next-steps "". That write comments on the GitHub issue or PR. started does not. Missing memory or a comment failure: warn once and continue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 9 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 713b9a456a0c
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Kripu77/software-factory (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 202 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
Five-axis code review validating correctness, contracts, readability, security, performance.
review-pr
PR review using parallel specialized agents for code quality, security, testing, architecture, and performance analysis. Synthesizes findings into a review report with conventional comments (praise/issue/suggestion/nitpick) and approve or request-changes verdict. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting security…
release
Release manager for frontend and mobile. Writes App Store notes, user-facing changelog, flags stale docs and landing copy. Actions: notes | changelog | docs | sync.
address
Address code review feedback — corroborate, validate, and implement changes from a review's final.md.
post
Post the current OCR review to a GitHub PR.
swift-critique
Critique SwiftUI code for patterns, design, clean code, accessibility, and performance.