gsd:execute-phase

A phase-execution command that runs all unfinished work plans in dependency-based waves. A phase is a group of related development tasks, and waves are batches that can run in parallel when they do not depend on one another.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to execute every plan in a phase or run only a selected wave for staged delivery.
Why use it?
It organizes a large implementation into manageable batches and avoids starting work before its prerequisites are ready.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/kryptobaseddev/cleo/execute-phase
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kryptobaseddev/cleo

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 17 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 733 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00017 $0.00733
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00367
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00147
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00073

Measured yesterday against content hash 687fc86ecb0e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd:execute-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.cleo/agent-outputs/T-POMODORO-BENCH-2026-04-16/gsd/.claude/commands/gsd/execute-phase.md · 64 lines

What it actually says

Orchestrator stays lean: discover plans, analyze dependencies, group into waves, spawn subagents, collect results. Each subagent loads the full execute-plan context and handles its own plan.

Optional wave filter:

  • --wave N executes only Wave N for pacing, quota management, or staged rollout
  • phase verification/completion still only happens when no incomplete plans remain after the selected wave finishes

Flag handling rule:

  • The optional flags documented below are available behaviors, not implied active behaviors
  • A flag is active only when its literal token appears in $ARGUMENTS
  • If a documented flag is absent from $ARGUMENTS, treat it as inactive

Context budget: ~15% orchestrator, 100% fresh per subagent.

<execution_context> @/tmp/pomodoro-bench/gsd/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md @/tmp/pomodoro-bench/gsd/.claude/get-shit-done/references/ui-brand.md </execution_context>

<runtime_note> Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls AskUserQuestion. They are equivalent — vscode_askquestions is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API. </runtime_note>

Available optional flags (documentation only — not automatically active):

  • --wave N — Execute only Wave N in the phase. Use when you want to pace execution or stay inside usage limits.
  • --gaps-only — Execute only gap closure plans (plans with gap_closure: true in frontmatter). Use after verify-work creates fix plans.
  • --interactive — Execute plans sequentially inline (no subagents) with user checkpoints between tasks. Lower token usage, pair-programming style. Best for small phases, bug fixes, and verification gaps.

Active flags must be derived from $ARGUMENTS:

  • --wave N is active only if the literal --wave token is present in $ARGUMENTS
  • --gaps-only is active only if the literal --gaps-only token is present in $ARGUMENTS
  • --interactive is active only if the literal --interactive token is present in $ARGUMENTS
  • If none of these tokens appear, run the standard full-phase execution flow with no flag-specific filtering
  • Do not infer that a flag is active just because it is documented in this prompt

Context files are resolved inside the workflow via gsd-tools init execute-phase and per-subagent <files_to_read> blocks.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 64 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 687fc86ecb0e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd:execute-phase is a command published in the GitHub repository kryptobaseddev/cleo (160 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 733 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.