Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboardingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/ship.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.02073 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01037 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00415 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ship — Pre-Deploy Readiness Check
Run before every production or staging deployment to verify the branch is safe to ship.
Step 1 — Detect Stack
Check which stacks are present in the repo root:
[ -f "pom.xml" ] && echo "STACK:java"
[ -f "package.json" ] && grep -q '"@nestjs/core"' package.json && echo "STACK:nestjs"
[ -f "package.json" ] && grep -q '"@angular/core"' package.json && echo "STACK:angular"
[ -f "pyproject.toml" ] || [ -f "requirements.txt" ] && echo "STACK:python"
[ -f "pubspec.yaml" ] && echo "STACK:flutter"
git log --oneline -3
git status --short
Run all applicable checks below for each detected stack.
Step 1b — Security Lock Document Check
Before running any stack checks, verify a security approval exists for the current commit:
COMMIT=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
ls docs/approvals/security-*-${COMMIT}.md 2>/dev/null && echo "LOCK: found" || echo "LOCK: missing"
If missing: STOP. Do not proceed with the ship check.
❌ BLOCKED: No security approval found for commit [COMMIT].
Run /audit-security first. The Lock Document (docs/approvals/security-*-[COMMIT].md)
must exist before /ship can proceed. This ensures the security audit was not skipped.
If this is a staging deploy and you intentionally want to skip the security gate,
pass --skip-security-lock with explicit justification.
If found: continue to Step 2.
Step 2 — Blockers (must all pass)
Java / Spring Boot
./mvnw test -q 2>&1 | tail -20
./mvnw package -DskipTests -q 2>&1 | tail -10
./mvnw dependency:check -q 2>&1 | grep -E "WARN|ERROR|CVE" | head -20
NestJS
npm test -- --passWithNoTests 2>&1 | tail -20
npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 | head -20
npm run lint 2>&1 | tail -10
npm run build 2>&1 | tail -10
npm audit --audit-level=high 2>&1 | tail -20
Angular
npm test -- --watch=false --browsers=ChromeHeadless 2>&1 | tail -20
npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 | head -20
npm run lint 2>&1 | tail -10
npm run build -- --configuration=production 2>&1 | tail -10
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 218 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A d5fb727e162e
ship is a command published in the GitHub repository kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding (35 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 2,073 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.