Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lab94/frenchie-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/qa-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/qa-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/qa-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/qa-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/qa-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00148 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00059 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
qa-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/qa-analysis
Design tests before implementation planning.
Cover happy paths, edge cases, negative cases, permission/role cases, regression checks, automation targets, fixture/data needs, and manual checks. Preserve TDD order: 03-test-case.md must exist before 04-implementation-plan.md for production work.
Artifact contract: write or update the canonical 03-test-case.md. Do not create 06-qa-analysis.md or any other numbered QA artifact. If an older feature folder already has QA content under a non-canonical name, migrate the content into 03-test-case.md and record that normalization in state.json.decisions[].
Aliases: /test-case, /frenchie-qa-analysis.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b0d38c82e140
qa-analysis is a command published in the GitHub repository Lab94/frenchie-skill (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 148 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
bugfix
Bug fix workflow: root cause analysis → user review → regression test + fix via TDD.
eval
Evaluate and improve one healthcare agent's system prompt. Run up to 5 iterations of: prepare fixed questions -> answer -> judge -> improve -> re-score -> commit if better.
usage-add
PitWay: Accumulate measured planning or qa token usage onto a milestone.
speckit.tdd.plan
Derive the feature's test list by delegating to zfa tdd plan (deterministic engine); falls back to LLM-guided derivation only when zfa is unavailable.
tdd
A command that follows test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write tests before the code they check. It moves through writing a failing test, adding the smallest implementation, and then improving the code.
tdd
Canon TDD (specify, encode, fulfill) with one test at a time, approval gates, and kitchen-cleaning refactor when needed.