Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lab94/frenchie-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/redo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/redo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/redo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/redo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lab94/frenchie-skill/redo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00911 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00364 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00182 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
redo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/redo
Mark a Method stage as needing rework. Cascades staleness to all downstream artifacts so /method-check and /frenchie-method accurately reflect what is current.
Syntax: /redo <stage>
Aliases: /frenchie-redo.
Stages
| Argument | Artifact | Downstream cascade |
|---|---|---|
requirement |
01-requirement.md |
02-acceptance-criteria.md, 03-test-case.md, 04-implementation-plan.md, 05-design.md, 06-test-report.md, 09-release-checklist.md |
qa-analysis |
03-test-case.md |
04-implementation-plan.md, 06-test-report.md, 09-release-checklist.md |
design |
05-design.md |
04-implementation-plan.md, 06-test-report.md, 09-release-checklist.md |
sa-analysis |
04-implementation-plan.md |
06-test-report.md, 09-release-checklist.md |
run-test |
06-test-report.md |
09-release-checklist.md |
walkthrough |
07-walkthrough.md |
08-review-report.md, 09-release-checklist.md |
pr-review |
08-review-report.md |
09-release-checklist.md |
release-check |
09-release-checklist.md |
(none) |
security-review and task-plan do not produce a single canonical artifact — /redo does not accept them as direct stages. To redo security analysis, redo the upstream stage (requirement or sa-analysis) and re-invoke /security-review.
If /redo design changes user-facing affordances (button labels, control visibility, flow ordering), also /redo qa-analysis afterward. The cascade table does not auto-invalidate qa-analysis on design because most design redos are visual (color, spacing, typography) and do not affect Gherkin scenarios — but the moment a label or control changes, scenarios like "Then the user clicks Save" become stale and the test cases need a refresh. The chain is manual to keep the common case (visual tweaks) cheap.
Behavior
- Resolve the active feature using the rules in
skills/core/state-check.md. - Look up the artifact for
<stage>in the active feature's state. - Mark that artifact's
statusasstale(ordraftif no body has been written). - Cascade: for every downstream artifact in the table above, if it currently has
status: ready, downgrade it tostale. Artifacts alreadymissingordraftstay as they are. - Append to
state.json.decisions[]:{ "at": "<ISO>", "decision": "redo-<stage>", "reason": "<user reason if given>" } - Update
state.json.lastModifiedAt(current ISO) andlastModifiedBy(current agent identifier). - Recommend the next command — typically the slash command that produces the artifact for
<stage>(e.g./redo designrecommends/design). The user is responsible for invoking it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3aae7e4e70d6
redo is a command published in the GitHub repository Lab94/frenchie-skill (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 911 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.
speckit.bug.test
Validate that a previously fixed bug is resolved and record the verification report.