Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Larens94/codednaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/larens94/codedna/manifest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/larens94/codedna/manifest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/larens94/codedna/manifest/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/larens94/codedna/manifest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/larens94/codedna/manifest.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00386 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00154 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
manifest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/codedna:manifest
Build a complete architectural map of the project by reading only the module docstrings (first 10-15 lines) of every source file. Do NOT read full file contents.
-
Scan all source files (exclude
venv/,node_modules/,.git/,__pycache__/,dist/,build/). -
For each file, extract only the module-level annotation fields:
exports:— public APIused_by:— reverse dependency graphrules:— hard constraintsagent:— last session entry
-
Output a structured map grouped by directory:
CodeDNA Architectural Map
=========================
api/routes.py
exports: revenue_route(req) -> Response
used_by: workers/report.py → generate
rules: all routes require auth middleware before handler
agent: claude-sonnet-4-6 | 2026-03-20 | added rate limiting
utils/format.py
exports: format_currency(n) -> str | format_date(d) -> str
used_by: api/routes.py → revenue_route | views/dashboard.py → render
rules: format_currency uses locale from request context, never hardcode
[unannotated]
migrations/001.py
new_feature.py
- After the map, output a one-line summary:
<N> files mapped | <N> unannotated | <N> dependency edges
This command is designed to replace 10-20 individual file reads at the start of a session. Use it as the first step before any multi-file task.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 2cf6320ae0c9
manifest is a command published in the GitHub repository Larens94/codedna (151 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 386 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
manifest compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| manifestLarens94/codedna | Command | 151 | 13d ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| mempalace-initMemPalace/mempalace | Command | 60k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| searchMemPalace/mempalace | Command | 60k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| mempalace-statusMemPalace/mempalace | Command | 60k | yesterday | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| AGENTSlanggenius/dify | Command | 160k | yesterday | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| reviewvstorm-co/full-stack-ai-agent-template | Command | 2.0k | 7d ago | MIT | A | 6 | Claude Code |
| /opsx-explorecoeusyk/inference-x | Command | 2 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code, Cursor |