Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lckx777/copy-chief-blackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/review-all)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/review-all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/review-all/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/review-all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/review-all.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.02332 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.01166 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00466 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00233 |
Grade A, and why
review-all scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 316 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Comprehensive Review
Review all copy for offer: $ARGUMENTS
Pre-Flight Check
# Verify production exists
ls production/$ARGUMENTS/{vsl,landing-page,creatives,emails}/ 2>/dev/null || echo "PRODUCTION NOT COMPLETE"
Do NOT proceed if production is incomplete.
Review Sequence
Step 1: Internal Review (reviewer agent)
Run full review across all deliverables:
/agent reviewer "
TASK: Comprehensive review of all production
PATH: production/$ARGUMENTS/
REVIEW EACH:
1. VSL Script
- Hook: 6-Question Test
- Body: 5-Point Review
- Consistency: 5-Point Review
2. Landing Page
- Each of 14 blocks
- Overall flow
- CTA clarity
3. Ad Creatives
- Hook effectiveness per platform
- Format appropriateness
- Message consistency
4. Email Sequence
- Individual emails
- Sequence flow
- CTA progression
OUTPUT: production/$ARGUMENTS/reviews/internal-review.md
"
Step 2: copy-critic Validation
Use copy-critic skill to validate strategic elements:
Use copy-critic to validate:
1. MUP Consistency
"Validate that MUP is consistently applied across:
- VSL hook and body
- Landing page headline and ruminação
- Ad creatives
- Email sequence"
2. MUS Clarity
"Validate that MUS is clearly explained and proof is sufficient in:
- VSL body
- Landing page passo-a-passo
- Email sequence (solution email)"
3. One Belief Reinforcement
"Check that One Belief is reinforced throughout:
- All major copy pieces
- Without contradiction"
4. CTA Alignment
"Verify CTAs match the promise made in:
- VSL close
- Landing page CTA blocks
- Email closes"
OUTPUT: production/$ARGUMENTS/reviews/copy-critic-verdicts.md
Step 2.5: Cognitive-Affective Gap Validation (v6.1) ⚠️ NOVO
Fonte:
~/.claude/rules/copy-chief.mdv6.1 (Pesquisa Externa 06.md)
5 Stress-Test Prompts (OBRIGATÓRIO):
Para CADA deliverable principal (VSL, LP, Criativos principais):
1. "Se eu mostrasse isso para a pessoa mais cética que conheço no nicho,
qual seria a primeira objeção?"
2. "Qual frase específica faria alguém rolar os olhos e fechar a página?"
3. "Se eu tirasse toda promessa e deixasse só a prova, ainda seria
convincente?"
4. "Lendo só as headlines, consigo entender a transformação completa?"
5. "Tem algum ponto onde parece que estou tentando vender em vez de ajudar?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 316 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 1cce097023e4
review-all is a command published in the GitHub repository lckx777/copy-chief-black (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 2,332 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.