Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lckx777/copy-chief-blackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/validate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/validate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lckx777/copy-chief-black/validate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00302 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00151 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/validate — Run Quality Gate for Current Phase
Read the active offer's helix-state.yaml to determine current phase, then:
-
Load the appropriate task file from
~/.claude/tasks/:- RESEARCH phase →
~/.claude/tasks/research-quality-gate.md - BRIEFING phase →
~/.claude/tasks/briefing-quality-gate.md - PRODUCTION phase →
~/.claude/tasks/production-quality-gate.md - DELIVERED phase →
~/.claude/tasks/delivery-quality-gate.md
- RESEARCH phase →
-
Read the task file completely.
-
Create a TaskCreate checklist with ALL steps from the task file.
-
Execute each step sequentially:
- For file verification steps: use Glob/Read to check existence
- For MCP steps: use the appropriate MCP tool (validate_gate, blind_critic, etc)
- For human approval: use AskUserQuestion
-
After all steps, present a summary:
- PASSED items (with scores where applicable)
- FAILED items (with specific feedback)
- RECOMMENDATION: advance phase or fix issues
If no offer is detected, show error and suggest /status or ecosystem-guide.
Arguments:
- $ARGUMENTS can specify offer path:
/validate concursos/decifra-lei-seca - If no argument, detect from current-offer.json or most recent offer
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 30 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2e8bf4513de2
validate is a command published in the GitHub repository lckx777/copy-chief-black (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 302 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.
tdd
A command that follows test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write tests before the code they check. It moves through writing a failing test, adding the smallest implementation, and then improving the code.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.