Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lemon-etvibe/prompt-vaultWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lemon-etvibe/prompt-vault/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lemon-etvibe/prompt-vault/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lemon-etvibe/prompt-vault/report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lemon-etvibe/prompt-vault/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lemon-etvibe/prompt-vault/report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00153 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You MUST use the Skill tool to invoke prompt-vault:report with args {argument or "all"}.
This skill:
- Runs
generate-report.shto parse_index.md+phase-*.md→ HTML reports - Generates
report-summary.html(dashboard) andreport-detail.html(chat log) - Zero token cost — pure shell script execution
Do NOT generate or write HTML manually — always delegate to the skill.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 15 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A faa26153a10c
report is a command published in the GitHub repository lemon-etvibe/prompt-vault (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 153 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
repo-cleanup
Commit accumulated spec doc changes: survey, group by logical batch, branch, commit, merge.
session.spec
Task: t-1343 Related: tasks.spec.md (rotation contract).
triage_stale.spec
Task: t-1355 Command: brana backlog triage-stale.
reference.spec
Task: t-1341 Related: docs/architecture/testing-validation.md (canonical enum source).
report
Analyze Claude Code skill usage with dormancy detection and actionable recommendations.
simplify
The over-engineering review: five tags (delete, stdlib, native, yagni, shrink), a mandatory replacement per finding, and a real null result when there is nothing to cut.