Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leonardoaa/cloud-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/leonardoaa/cloud-mcp/sdd-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/leonardoaa/cloud-mcp/sdd-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/leonardoaa/cloud-mcp/sdd-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/leonardoaa/cloud-mcp/sdd-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/leonardoaa/cloud-mcp/sdd-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01240 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
sdd-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 40 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Voce esta executando /sdd-plan para planejar uma issue Jira. Entrada: $ARGUMENTS.
Regras obrigatorias:
- Extraia exatamente uma chave no formato
PROJ-123. Se estiver ausente ou ambigua, pergunte antes de continuar. Antes doJIRA_GATE, execute a descoberta de peers do bloco multi-projeto: se a chave pertencer a um grupo, aplique o FANOUT e planeje cada membro, naorder, executando as regras abaixo por completo dentro do workspace de cada membro; caso contrario, siga em MODO SINGLE sem alteracao. - Execute o
JIRA_GATEantes de criar ou alterardocs/sdd/specs: chamejira_get_workspace_binding. Se nao houver vinculo, liste perfis, pergunte qual perfil/projeto usar, vincule e valide novamente. Sem contexto Jira valido, encerre sem gerar planejamento local. - Execute o checkpoint inicial na seguinte sequencia:
a. Leia a issue com
jira_get_issue. Recuse se o projeto nao corresponder ao binding. b. Calcule um hash normalizado dos campos principais da issue. c. Chamejira_record_sdd_eventno pai comeventKey: <ISSUE>/plan/<hash12>/started,eventType: PLAN_STARTED,targetStatus: inProgresse o proximo passo. d. Falha neste checkpoint bloqueia o comando. Nao prossiga. - Consulte anexos. Nesta fase, leia os relevantes diretamente do Jira apenas para avaliacao; nao crie diretorio, asset, spec, workflow ou subtarefa.
- Leia
.claude/agents/sdd-refinement-reviewer.mde delegue usando exatamentesubagent_type: "sdd-refinement-reviewer". Nunca usecode,developerou agente generico. - Se o veredito for
BLOCKED, registrePLAN_BLOCKEDno pai com a mesma revisao, blockers e proximo passo; pare antes de qualquer escrita local ou subtarefa. - Para refinar, colete respostas do usuario e mostre um patch Jira proposto. Somente apos confirmacao explicita use
jira_edit_task; depois releia a issue e repita oREFINEMENT_GATEcompleto. Resposta em chat sem persistencia no Jira nao libera o planejamento. - O gate so passa com zero blockers, zero
NEEDS CLARIFICATION, criterios verificaveis e anexos obrigatorios acessiveis. Warnings aceitos devem virar premissas explicitas e reversiveis. - Somente apos
REFINEMENT_GATE: PASS, leia os padroes e crie/retome a pasta. Inicialize ou migreworkflow.jsonschema v2 comrunId,planRevision,attempts,eventLedgerependingJiraEvents. - Execute
ATTACHMENT_INGEST: baixe todos os anexos listados paraassets/. Use<attachmentId>-<nome-saneado>, removendo diretorios, controles e caracteres fora de[A-Za-z0-9._-]; nunca sobrescreva IDs diferentes. - Grave texto em UTF-8 e decodifique binarios Base64 sem imprimir conteudo em logs. Calcule SHA-256 e gere
assets/manifest.jsoncom ID, nome original, path relativo, MIME, tamanhos, hash, status e erro seguro. Nunca execute anexos. - Antes dos agentes, delegue exatamente
sdd-jira-coordinatorpara criar/reconciliar[SDD][SPEC] Specification,[SDD][RESEARCH] Technical Researche[SDD][PLAN] Technical Plan. - Leia
sdd-orchestrator.mde delegue exatamentesdd-orchestratorem modo PLAN. Para cada agente, o orquestrador deve transicionar/comentar a subtarefa comTASK_STARTEDantes da chamada eTASK_COMPLETEDsomente apos artefato/check aprovado.14. A sequencia exata esdd-spec-writer,sdd-researcher,sdd-planner; depoissdd-jira-coordinatorreconcilia asTASK-*e a subtarefa[SDD][QA] Quality Review, cuja chave confirmada e registrada emqa.issueKey. Spec comNEEDS CLARIFICATIONregistra falha e volta ao refinement. - Nao edite codigo, nao crie branch e nao invoque implementador ou QA neste comando.
- Grave
phase: "READY_TO_BUILD"somente com refinement PASS, checklist PASS, documentos completos, hashes consistentes e subtarefas reconciliadas.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A adcb1d134a1e
sdd-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository leonardoaa/cloud-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,240 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.