review

A command that runs CodeRabbit’s review tool on local code changes and turns its findings into actionable tasks. CodeRabbit is an automated code-review program.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changes against the main branch and record each critical issue, warning, or informational finding with its file, line, and suggested fix.
Why use it?
It provides structured findings without reviewing a pull request, making local problems easier to track and fix.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/liam-hq/liam/review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/liam-hq/liam

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 12 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 190 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00012 $0.00190
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00095
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00038
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00019

Measured 3d ago against content hash aa361e4d6663, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/review.md · 33 lines

What it actually says

CodeRabbit CLI Review (Local changes only)

Do NOT check or review pull requests. Do NOT call gh commands. Run CodeRabbit locally against the working repository only.

Run

Execute exactly:

coderabbit --plain -t all --base origin/main -c claude.md coderabbit.yaml

Parse → Tasks

From the output, extract for each finding:

  • Severity: Critical | Warning | Info
  • File and line
  • Description
  • Suggested fix

Create one TodoWrite per finding:

  • title: [Severity] <file>:<line> <short description>
  • body: <Suggested fix>
  • metadata: { "file": "<file>", "line": <line>, "severity": "<Severity>" }
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 33 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A aa361e4d6663

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository liam-hq/liam (5,100 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 190 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.