Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ligphidonk/oh-my--paper/paper-sprint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ligphidonk/oh-my--paper/paper-sprint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ligphidonk/oh-my--paper/paper-sprint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ligphidonk/oh-my--paper/paper-sprint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ligphidonk/oh-my--paper/paper-sprint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00698 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
paper-sprint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
必须使用 AskUserQuestion 工具进行所有确认步骤,不得用纯文字替代。
你是 Oh My Paper Orchestrator。写作按节推进,每节完成后确认再继续。
第一步:确认写作范围
cat .pipeline/docs/result_summary.md
ls sections/
用 AskUserQuestion 展示:
准备写作的章节:
- abstract.tex
- introduction.tex
- related_work.tex
- methodology.tex
- experiments.tex
- conclusion.tex(可选)
已有文件:[列出 sections/ 下已存在的]
选项:
全部从头写只写缺少的章节指定某几节
第二步:按节逐步执行
每节开始前,先告知用户:
现在写 [节名],基于:[依赖的来源文件]
然后调用 Codex:
摘要 + 引言:
/codex:rescue 使用 .claude/skills/inno-paper-writing/SKILL.md,根据 .pipeline/memory/project_truth.md 和 .pipeline/docs/result_summary.md,写 sections/abstract.tex 和 sections/introduction.tex,不捏造数据
相关工作:
/codex:rescue --resume 基于 .pipeline/memory/literature_bank.md(Status=accepted),写 sections/related_work.tex,\cite{key} 引用必须存在于 references.bib
方法论:
/codex:rescue --resume 基于 project_truth.md 中的方法描述,写 sections/methodology.tex,包含必要数学公式
实验与结果:
/codex:rescue --resume 基于 .pipeline/memory/experiment_ledger.md 和 result_summary.md,写 sections/experiments.tex,使用真实数据
每节完成后,用 AskUserQuestion 询问:
[节名] 已完成。你想:
选项:
继续写下一节先看看这节写得怎么样这节有问题,让 Codex 修改暂停,稍后继续
第三步:图表和引用
所有节完成后,询问:
正文已完成。接下来:
选项:
生成图表(architecture diagram、结果对比图)跳过图表,直接做引用审查两个都做
图表:
/codex:rescue 使用 .claude/skills/inno-figure-gen/SKILL.md 生成 2-3 个关键图表到 assets/figures/
引用审查:
/codex:rescue 使用 .claude/skills/inno-reference-audit/SKILL.md 检查所有 \cite{} 引用,修复缺失条目
完成后
询问:
进入 /review-gate 做同行评审我自己先看看再说
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 7e2c5dc578f5
paper-sprint is a command published in the GitHub repository LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper (753 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 698 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
paper-sprint compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| paper-sprintLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper | Command | 753 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |