Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc/research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00476 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to research — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Hand a deep-research task to the agy:runner subagent
(subagent_type: "agy:runner").
Wrap the user's topic in a research-oriented preamble so agy treats it as
a structured investigation rather than a quick Q&A.
Raw user request: $ARGUMENTS
How to forward
Build the research prompt for the subagent as:
Conduct a thorough research investigation on the following topic. Look up
authoritative sources, summarize the current state of knowledge, surface
disagreements or open questions, and structure the response with clear
sections (Background, Key findings, Caveats, Sources).
Topic: <stripped user request here>
(Strip any routing flags — --background, --model <alias> — from the
topic text before injecting it.)
Then invoke the agy:runner subagent with that prompt as
subagent_type: "agy:runner".
Routing rules
- If the request contains
--background, launch the subagent withrun_in_background: true. Research is often long-running — prefer background unless the user explicitly asked for foreground. - If the request contains
--model <alias>, forward it to the subagent so it can be appended to the wrapper call as--model <alias>(placed before the prompt argument). If no model is given, leave the choice to whatever the TUI is currently set to (a reasoning-strong model likeprooropusworks well for research).
Aliases: flash-low, flash-medium, flash, pro-low, pro, sonnet,
opus, gpt-oss. Canonical TUI strings (e.g. "Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)")
are also accepted. Run /agy:help for the full table.
Response style
Return the subagent's output verbatim — no extra commentary before or after.
If the user did not supply a topic, ask what they want researched.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 43366f6c6794
research is a command published in the GitHub repository limeflash/antigravity-plugin-cc (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 476 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to research, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.