taskstoissues

A command that turns existing tasks into GitHub issues, which are tracked work items in a code repository, ordered by dependencies.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect task artifacts, identify their order, verify the GitHub remote, and create matching issues through GitHub tools.
Why use it?
It converts a task list into actionable repository work while checking that the remote repository is the intended GitHub project.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/linfee/spec-kit-cn/taskstoissues
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Linfee/spec-kit-cn
Per session 32 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 335 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00032 $0.00335
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00168
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00067
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00034

Measured 2d ago against content hash 25f58b49165f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

taskstoissues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

templates/commands/taskstoissues.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

用户输入

$ARGUMENTS

你必须在继续之前考虑用户输入(如果非空).

大纲

  1. 从仓库根目录运行 {SCRIPT} 并解析 FEATURE_DIR 和 AVAILABLE_DOCS 列表. 所有路径必须是绝对路径. 对于参数中的单引号如 "I'm Groot", 使用转义语法: 例如 'I'''m Groot'(或尽可能使用双引号: "I'm Groot").
  2. 从执行的脚本中, 提取 任务 的路径.
  3. 通过运行以下命令获取 Git 远程仓库:
git config --get remote.origin.url

[!CAUTION] 仅当远程仓库是 GITHUB URL 时才继续下一步

  1. 对于列表中的每个任务, 使用 GitHub MCP 服务器在与 Git 远程仓库对应的仓库中创建一个新议题.

[!CAUTION] 在任何情况下都不要在与远程 URL 不匹配的仓库中创建议题

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 34 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 25f58b49165f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

taskstoissues is a command published in the GitHub repository Linfee/spec-kit-cn (695 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 335 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.