Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/liortesta/clawdagent/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/liortesta/ClawdAgentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/liortesta/clawdagent/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/liortesta/clawdagent/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/liortesta/clawdagent/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00269 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Comprehensive Code Review
Run a 3-agent review on the current changes.
Process:
- First, run
git diffto identify all changed files - Spawn 3 subagents IN PARALLEL:
- code-reviewer agent: Review for quality, readability, maintainability, and best practices
- security-auditor agent: Scan for vulnerabilities, OWASP Top 10, secrets exposure
- qa-engineer agent: Verify test coverage, suggest missing tests, check edge cases
- Collect all findings from the 3 agents
- Synthesize into a single prioritized report
Output Format:
## Review Summary
**Verdict**: [APPROVE / REQUEST CHANGES / NEEDS DISCUSSION]
### Critical Issues (must fix before merge)
- [issue with file:line reference]
### Security Concerns
- [finding with severity]
### Test Coverage
- [coverage assessment]
- [missing tests]
### Suggestions (non-blocking)
- [improvement ideas]
### Highlights (things done well)
- [positive feedback]
Rules:
- NEVER approve code with critical security issues
- ALWAYS provide specific file:line references
- ALWAYS suggest the fix, not just the problem
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 42 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5a693aca1e72
review is a command published in the GitHub repository liortesta/ClawdAgent (11 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 269 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.