Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/liortesta/ClawdAgentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/liortesta/clawdagent/review-with-fresh-eyes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/liortesta/clawdagent/review-with-fresh-eyes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/liortesta/clawdagent/review-with-fresh-eyes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/liortesta/clawdagent/review-with-fresh-eyes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/liortesta/clawdagent/review-with-fresh-eyes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00365 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
review-with-fresh-eyes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Fresh-Eyes Code Review
Spawn a NEW subagent with clean context to review the code changes. The reviewer MUST NOT see the original implementation discussion — only the final code.
Process:
- Identify all changed files (git diff)
- Spawn a subagent with ONLY the following context:
- The changed files (final version)
- The test files (if any)
- The CLAUDE.md project rules
- NO conversation history, NO implementation reasoning
- The reviewer should:
- Read the code as if seeing it for the first time
- Check for bugs, logic errors, and edge cases
- Check for security issues
- Check for anti-patterns and code smells
- Rate quality 1-10
- Try to "break" the code mentally — think of inputs that would cause failures
- If rating is below 7 — list specific issues that need fixing
- If rating is 7+ — approve with any minor suggestions
Why Fresh Eyes?
The developer (or Claude) who wrote the code has anchoring bias — they're mentally committed to their approach. A fresh reviewer with no context will catch things the author is blind to.
Output Format:
## Fresh-Eyes Review
**Reviewer Context**: Clean (no implementation history)
**Files Reviewed**: [list]
### Quality Rating: X/10
### Bugs Found
- [bug with file:line reference]
### Security Issues
- [issue with severity]
### Anti-Patterns
- [pattern with suggestion]
### Breaking Scenarios
- [input/scenario that could cause failure]
### Verdict: APPROVE / REQUEST CHANGES
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 57 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 53ca6f3ae27f
review-with-fresh-eyes is a command published in the GitHub repository liortesta/ClawdAgent (11 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 365 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.