Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/littlebearapps/pitchdocs/llms-txtgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/littlebearapps/pitchdocsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/littlebearapps/pitchdocs/llms-txt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/littlebearapps/pitchdocs/llms-txt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/littlebearapps/pitchdocs/llms-txt.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00596 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
llms-txt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/llms-txt
Generate an llms.txt file (and optionally llms-full.txt) following the llmstxt.org specification. This provides AI coding assistants and search engines with a structured index of your project's documentation.
Behaviour
- Load the
llms-txtskill for the specification and generation patterns - Load the
doc-standardsrule for description quality - Read the project manifest (
package.json,pyproject.toml, etc.) for name and description - Scan the repository for documentation files:
- Core:
README.md,docs/, API reference - Guides:
docs/guides/ - Examples:
examples/ - Supporting:
CONTRIBUTING.md,CHANGELOG.md,SECURITY.md,CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md,ROADMAP.md,LICENSE
- Core:
- Write benefit-focused descriptions for each file (not just file names)
- Assemble
llms.txtfollowing the spec:- H1 from project name
- Blockquote from manifest description or README first paragraph
- H2 sections grouping docs by category
## Optionalfor supporting files
- If
fullargument: concatenate all referenced files intollms-full.txt
Output Files
| File | Content | When |
|---|---|---|
llms.txt |
Index with relative links and benefit-focused descriptions | Always |
llms-full.txt |
Concatenated Markdown of all referenced docs | Only with full argument |
Description Quality
Every file annotation must be benefit-focused:
Good: [Getting Started](./docs/guides/getting-started.md): Install, configure, and deploy your first worker in under 5 minutes
Bad: [Getting Started](./docs/guides/getting-started.md): Getting started guide
Use at least 3 different benefit categories across the file (Time saved, Confidence gained, Pain avoided, Capability unlocked, Cost reduced).
Arguments
- No arguments: generate
llms.txtonly for the current project full: generate bothllms.txtandllms-full.txt- Path argument: generate for a specific project directory
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 64 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A fc791dc07526
llms-txt is a command published in the GitHub repository littlebearapps/pitchdocs (8 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 596 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
create-skill
Create an AI skill from any source (URL, repo, PDF, video, notebook, etc.).
sync-config
Sync a scraping config's URLs against the live documentation site.
feature-plan
Guide the agent to create or update a feature plan from a short feature request.
release
Guided release for the skill-engine repo. Bumps the six version surfaces, drafts the CHANGELOG entry, runs validators, then pauses for the maintainer to commit, push, and tag manually. Accepts major / minor / patch / explicit X.Y.Z.
adr-export
Export ADRs to HTML, JSON, or PDF format.
doctor
hi-vibe's own health check — actually runs hi-vibe's 5 hooks & scanner to catch silent failure. Not Claude Code's built-in /doctor (that one checks your CLI install).