Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to llcoolblaze/claude-boris. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/llcoolblaze/claude-boris/main/.claude/commands/review-changes.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/llcoolblaze/claude-borisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/llcoolblaze/claude-boris/review-changes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/llcoolblaze/claude-boris/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/llcoolblaze/claude-boris/review-changes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/llcoolblaze/claude-boris/review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/llcoolblaze/claude-boris/review-changes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00281 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
review-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Current Changes
Status
!git status --short
Diff
!git diff
Staged Changes
!git diff --cached
Code Review
Analyze the changes above and provide feedback:
1. Summary
Brief overview of what these changes accomplish.
2. Quality Assessment
Correctness
- Any obvious bugs or logic errors?
- Edge cases handled?
- Error handling appropriate?
Security
- Any security concerns?
- Input validation present?
- No hardcoded secrets?
Readability
- Code is clear and understandable?
- Good naming?
- Appropriate comments?
Performance
- Any performance concerns?
- Unnecessary operations?
3. Improvements
Specific suggestions for making the code better:
- Line X: [suggestion]
- Line Y: [suggestion]
4. Verification Needed
- What tests should be run?
- Any manual testing required?
5. Verdict
- ✅ Ready to commit - Changes look good
- ⚠️ Minor issues - Consider fixing before commit
- ❌ Needs work - Should fix before committing
If ready: suggest /commit-push-pr
If needs work: list specific items to address
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 532adadaafc4
review-changes is a command published in the GitHub repository llcoolblaze/claude-boris (49 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 281 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
spec-trace-requirements
You are verifying that implementation changes trace back to specification requirements.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).