Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/llv22/AutoResearchWithEyesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/llv22/autoresearchwitheyes/autor.auto-review-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/llv22/autoresearchwitheyes/autor.auto-review-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/llv22/autoresearchwitheyes/autor.auto-review-loop.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01790 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00895 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
autor.auto-review-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 200 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auto Review Loop: Autonomous Research Improvement
Autonomously iterate: review → implement fixes → re-review, until the external reviewer gives a positive assessment or MAX_ROUNDS is reached.
Context: $ARGUMENTS
Constants
All constants (MAX_ROUNDS, POSITIVE_THRESHOLD, REVIEWER_MODEL) are defined in the project's CLAUDE.md. Read them from there before proceeding.
- REVIEW_DOC:
AUTO_REVIEW.mdin project root (cumulative log)
State Persistence (Compact Recovery)
Long-running loops may hit the context window limit, triggering automatic compaction. To survive this, persist state to REVIEW_STATE.json after each round:
{
"round": 2,
"threadId": "019cd392-...",
"status": "in_progress",
"last_score": 5.0,
"last_verdict": "not ready",
"pending_experiments": ["screen_name_1"],
"timestamp": "2026-03-13T21:00:00"
}
Write this file at the end of every Phase E (after documenting the round). Overwrite each time — only the latest state matters.
On completion (positive assessment or max rounds), set "status": "completed" so future invocations don't accidentally resume a finished loop.
Workflow
Initialization
- Check for
REVIEW_STATE.jsonin project root:- If it does not exist: fresh start (normal case, identical to behavior before this feature existed)
- If it exists AND
statusis"completed": fresh start (previous loop finished normally) - If it exists AND
statusis"in_progress"ANDtimestampis older than 24 hours: fresh start (stale state from a killed/abandoned run — delete the file and start over) - If it exists AND
statusis"in_progress"ANDtimestampis within 24 hours: resume- Read the state file to recover
round,threadId,last_score,pending_experiments - Read
AUTO_REVIEW.mdto restore full context of prior rounds - If
pending_experimentsis non-empty, check if they have completed (e.g., check screen sessions) - Resume from the next round (round = saved round + 1)
- Log: "Recovered from context compaction. Resuming at Round N."
- Read the state file to recover
- Read project narrative documents, memory files, and any prior review documents
- Read recent experiment results (check output directories, logs)
- Identify current weaknesses and open TODOs from prior reviews
- Initialize round counter = 1 (unless recovered from state file)
- Create/update
AUTO_REVIEW.mdwith header and timestamp
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 200 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 4716ec09e11c
autor.auto-review-loop is a command published in the GitHub repository llv22/AutoResearchWithEyes (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,790 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.